2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(02)00300-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon sequestration in trees and regrowth vegetation as affected by clearcut and partial cut harvesting in a second-growth boreal mixedwood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
54
2
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
6
54
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Repeated short rotations would, under this scenario, result in declining soil C stocks. However, other authors concluded that there is little evidence that harvesting with immediate reforestation significantly affects soil carbon content (e.g., Heath et al 2002, Lee et al 2002, Martin et al 2005, Ter-Mikaelian et al 2008. Finally, Liski et al (2002) suggested that an increase in soil C with shortened rotations could be expected because shorter periods between tree harvesting operations tend to increase foliage and branch litterfall from standing trees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Repeated short rotations would, under this scenario, result in declining soil C stocks. However, other authors concluded that there is little evidence that harvesting with immediate reforestation significantly affects soil carbon content (e.g., Heath et al 2002, Lee et al 2002, Martin et al 2005, Ter-Mikaelian et al 2008. Finally, Liski et al (2002) suggested that an increase in soil C with shortened rotations could be expected because shorter periods between tree harvesting operations tend to increase foliage and branch litterfall from standing trees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 The first is to conserve existing carbon stocks (or delay their release), through practices such as delayed harvest, avoided harvest (conservation), fire or insect control, or improved soil management (Price et al 1997, Kurz et al 1998, Kurz and Apps 1999, Bhatti et al 2001, Amiro et al 2002. The second strategy is to increase the rate at which the forest sequesters and stores new carbon, through intensive management practices such as tree planting, species manipulation, stand thinning, or fertilization (Hoen and Solberg 1994, Sedjo and Botkin 1997, Sohngen and Mendelsohn 1998, Sampson and Scholes 2000, Lee et al 2002. The actual effectiveness of these different practices for increasing forest carbon will vary with a number of factors, including the initial age class structure of the forest, species mix, and the pattern of past disturbances in a particular forest area (Kurz and Apps 1999, Sampson and Scholes 2000, Kurz et al 2002.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boreal ecosystems have large C pools present which account for approximately 15 % of the world's terrestrial C (Harding et al, 2001;Banfield et al, 2002;Lee et al, 2002). The large amounts of C stored in Boreal ecosystems have a high potential to release C as climate changes due to alterations of temperature and growing season length (Billings et al, 1998;Payment and Jarvis, 2000;Harding et al, 2001;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large amounts of C stored in Boreal ecosystems have a high potential to release C as climate changes due to alterations of temperature and growing season length (Billings et al, 1998;Payment and Jarvis, 2000;Harding et al, 2001;. In Boreal ecosystems carbon is also released through both natural and anthropogenic disturbance and changes in the disturbance through land management need to be quantified across all land types (Halldin et al, 1999;Bhatti et al, 2002;Lee et al, 2002). There is also a need for greater understanding of C dynamics within these systems to fully understand the cycling of C and how changes to climate could affect C pools and fluxes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation