2022
DOI: 10.1109/tvlsi.2022.3146125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon Nanotube SRAM in 5-nm Technology Node Design, Optimization, and Performance Evaluation—Part I: CNFET Transistor Optimization

Abstract: In this article, we propose a carbon nanotube (CNT) field-effect transistor (CNFET)-based static random access memory (SRAM) design at the 5-nm technology node that is optimized based on the tradeoff between performance, stability, and power efficiency. In addition to size optimization, physical model parameters including CNT density, CNT diameter, and CNFET flat band voltage are evaluated and optimized for CNFET SRAM performance improvement. Optimized CNFET SRAM is compared with state-of-the-art 7-nm FinFET S… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Chen et al studied the impact of charge transfer doping on the performance and variability of MWCNT interconnects using enhanced compact models [ 53 , 54 ]. They further explored an all-carbon SRAM (ACS) (SRAM: Static Random-Access Memory) using a 5 nm technology node, which showed a great improvement in power efficiency with 72% lower energy-delay-product (EDP) and 48% lower static power, despite a slight speed reduction, compared to 7 nm FinFET (fin field-effect transistor) SRAM cells with copper-based interconnects [ 56 , 66 ].…”
Section: On-chip Interconnectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, Chen et al studied the impact of charge transfer doping on the performance and variability of MWCNT interconnects using enhanced compact models [ 53 , 54 ]. They further explored an all-carbon SRAM (ACS) (SRAM: Static Random-Access Memory) using a 5 nm technology node, which showed a great improvement in power efficiency with 72% lower energy-delay-product (EDP) and 48% lower static power, despite a slight speed reduction, compared to 7 nm FinFET (fin field-effect transistor) SRAM cells with copper-based interconnects [ 56 , 66 ].…”
Section: On-chip Interconnectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Triangle patterns represent the related references [ 23 , 24 ] from left to right respectively. For local level, square patterns represent the related references [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 38 , 39 , 41 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 ], from left to right respectively. Rhombus patterns represent the related references [ 23 , 24 , 39 , 52 ], from left to right respectively.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At fin‐type field‐effect transistor, the gate electrode design creates the gates with autonomous control on top of channel. FinFET Gate width represents “2nh” here n and h specifies number and height of fins respectively 11–14 . The number of fins maximized to have higher on‐current, which creates maximizes the gate control on the channel, which diminish the Short channel effects 15,16 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FinFET Gate width represents "2nh" here n and h specifies number and height of fins respectively. [11][12][13][14] The number of fins maximized to have higher on-current, which creates maximizes the gate control on the channel, which diminish the Short channel effects. 15,16 But in SG-FinFET, delay occurs in both read write operation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon nanotube field-effect transistors have gained a great importance recently because of their superior electrical, mechanical, and thermal feature [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. The formation of the covalent bonds sp 2 between atoms of carbon results in exceptional mechanical characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%