1988
DOI: 10.1002/9780470166376.ch1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon‐Hydrogen‐Transition Metal Bonds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
136
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 755 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 234 publications
11
136
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of well characterized examples of species with M⅐⅐⅐C-C interactions is in contrast with M⅐⅐⅐HC agostic complexes that are well established (42,43), some of which go on to C-H activate (44).…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The lack of well characterized examples of species with M⅐⅐⅐C-C interactions is in contrast with M⅐⅐⅐HC agostic complexes that are well established (42,43), some of which go on to C-H activate (44).…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…11. In this scenario, the eliminated oligomeric or polymeric vinyl macromonomer chain produced at one catalytic center is detained by binuclear interactions (presumably C-H⅐⅐⅐M ϩ agostic interactions between the electrophilic metal center and electron-rich C-H bonds-the importance of mononuclear agostic examples is of course well established in cationic d 0 polymerizations (29)(30)(31), involving the adjacent electrophilic metal center, and the weakly bound oligomeric͞ polymeric ␣-olefinic fragment therefore has an enhanced probability of subsequent intramolecular re-enchainment with 1,2 regiochemistry at a proximate Zr-ethyl ϩ or Zr-PЈ ϩ site. This model is consistent with an observed increase in product molecular weight with increasing catalyst͞cocatalyst nuclearity, with conversiondependent experiments revealing significant quantities of ethyl branches (but few other branches) produced in the Zr 2 ϩ B 2 polymerization system, even in the very earliest stages of the polymerization.…”
Section: Binuclear Structures and Macromolecular Branch Formation In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, agostic M-H-C interactions are characterized by relatively short M-H distances (Ϸ1.8-2.3 Å) and small M-H-C bond angles (Ϸ90-140°), whereas anagostic interactions are characterized by relatively long M⅐⅐⅐H distances (Ϸ2.3-2.9 Å) and large M-H-C bond angles (Ϸ110-170°) (40,41). With respect to 1 H NMR spectroscopy, a signature of an agostic interaction is an unusually low 1 J CH value, which can range from 50 to 100 Hz (13,14). Furthermore, the chemical shifts of agostic hydrogen atoms are typically observed upfield of the uncoordinated group, whereas anagostic hydrogen atoms are typically observed downfield; the latter observation is in accord with the hydrogen-bonded description of the interaction.…”
Section: Agostic and Anagostic Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To emphasize this point, a review on the subject was published in 1983 (13), after which the area developed rapidly, and a second review was published in 1988 (14). These reviews have been cited 1,097 and 715 times, respectively (as of November 2006).…”
Section: Introduction and Historical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%