2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-8742-0_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon Fixation in Diatoms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 181 publications
(195 reference statements)
0
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The CCM regulation in diatoms is highly dependent on light as well as CO 2 concentration (Harada et al, 2006). However, the major determinant of the extent of CCM expression in P. tricornutum is CO 2 concentration, as it is in green algae (Matsuda and Kroth, 2014) and many components of CCM are suppressed under elevated CO 2 concentrations and induced at atmospheric levels or lower. The CO 2 concentration affects expression, and consequently the activity, of not only CCMs components but also that of enzymes from metabolic pathways such as the CBB cycle and glycolysis, though this is still understudied.…”
Section: Effect Of Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CCM regulation in diatoms is highly dependent on light as well as CO 2 concentration (Harada et al, 2006). However, the major determinant of the extent of CCM expression in P. tricornutum is CO 2 concentration, as it is in green algae (Matsuda and Kroth, 2014) and many components of CCM are suppressed under elevated CO 2 concentrations and induced at atmospheric levels or lower. The CO 2 concentration affects expression, and consequently the activity, of not only CCMs components but also that of enzymes from metabolic pathways such as the CBB cycle and glycolysis, though this is still understudied.…”
Section: Effect Of Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this constraint, many phytoplankton species have developed an intracellular mechanisms that converts bicarbonate ions (HCO3 − ) to CO 2 at the active site of this enzyme, thereby supporting higher carbon fixation rates than what would be possible if photosynthesis only relied on diffusive CO 2 uptake (Giordano et al, 2005). The proportion at which both processes operate (i.e., direct CO 2 uptake vs. HCO3 − uptake) varies largely among species (e.g., Reinfelder, 2011;Matsuda and Kroth, 2014), as they differ in the efficiency and regulation of their CCMs (Burkhardt et al, 2001;Rost et al, 2003;Trimborn et al, 2008). Increases in the seawater CO 2 may directly benefit phytoplankton species primarily relying on diffusive CO 2 uptake or those with inefficient CCMs.…”
Section: Influence Of Elevated Pco 2 On Contrasting Phytoplankton Assmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the diverse and often extreme habitats they inhabit, it is not surprising that diatoms have evolved multiple ways to acquire inorganic C for growth. Several reviews focus on the function and diversity of diatom CCMs, including Roberts et al, 2007b;Matsuda and Kroth, 2014. Compared to other photoautotrophs, the form of rubisco found in diatoms has a relatively high specificity for CO 2 vs. O 2 (Badger et al, 1998;Tortell, 2000); nevertheless, the low equilibrium concentration and low diffusion coefficient for CO 2 in water would limit photosynthesis without a CCM. Numerous studies that measured C fluxes across external diatom membranes show that CO 2 as well as HCO 3 can be taken up by the cells (see below).…”
Section: Diatomsmentioning
confidence: 99%