2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/828131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon Dioxide Separation from Flue Gases: A Technological Review Emphasizing Reduction in Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Abstract: Increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHGs) such as CO2 in the atmosphere is a global warming. Human activities are a major cause of increased CO2 concentration in atmosphere, as in recent decade, two-third of greenhouse effect was caused by human activities. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a major strategy that can be used to reduce GHGs emission. There are three methods for CCS: pre-combustion capture, oxy-fuel process, and post-combustion capture. Among them, post-combustion capture is the most… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
217
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 347 publications
(241 citation statements)
references
References 199 publications
0
217
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…. 12a) and cost for the capture of CO 2 [42]. In all the cases, only less than 3 sources out of the 18 sources (on an average) selected, have a low CO 2 composition in flue gas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…. 12a) and cost for the capture of CO 2 [42]. In all the cases, only less than 3 sources out of the 18 sources (on an average) selected, have a low CO 2 composition in flue gas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Few reasons, other than the underestimation of the storage injection and transportation costs, may be the compositions of CO 2 in various flue gas sources used might have been inaccurate which can affect the costs considerably (as shown in fig. 3) or the model used for the capture and compression cost itself may not be accurate enough. However, literature also supports the fact that the capture and compression costs are the major contributor to the 365 CCS costs [10,42,14]. The main takeaway is that the capture processes cause the major lump of expenses and further optimization or invention of new technologies at much lower costs for capture can cause a major change in the overall costs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Also of note, porous carbons with ultra-micropores (<1 nm) are able to capture large amounts of CO 2 gas at 1 bar [16,43,44]. In this section, we show how this applies to GO materials.…”
Section: Co 2 Capture Studiesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…N 2 -CO 2 mixed gases with 7% CO 2 (representative of natural gas fired power plant flue gas composition [20]), 15% CO 2 (representative of the power plant flue gas composition powered by biofuel from a wastewater treatment plant [21]) and 100% CO 2 were mixed, then bubbled at a flow rate of~0.1-0.4 L/min through 1 L of the calcium carbonate slurry in a closed, stirred tank reactor with a gas outlet ducted to a fume hood. The pH and calcium concentrations were monitored as function of time until the values stabilized.…”
Section: Calcium Carbonate Solution Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%