2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon dioxide emissions from spring ploughing of grassland in Ireland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
24
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
24
3
Order By: Relevance
“…3c, 4c . These trends are similar to those reported in previous studies Reicosky and Lindstrom, 1995;Reicosky et al, 1997;Ellert and Janzen, 1999;Gesch et al, 2007;Willems et al, 2011 . The primary flush can be explained by the release of a high concentration of CO 2 from large voids in the soil Reicosky and Lindstrom, 1995;Ellert and Janzen, 1999 and the release of dissolved CO 2 from soil water caused by evaporation of water and exposure of air -water interfaces to atmospheric pressures and concentrations Reicosky and Lindstrom, 1995 as a result of soil inversion.…”
Section: Co 2 Exchange During Grassland Renovation and Regulating Facsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…3c, 4c . These trends are similar to those reported in previous studies Reicosky and Lindstrom, 1995;Reicosky et al, 1997;Ellert and Janzen, 1999;Gesch et al, 2007;Willems et al, 2011 . The primary flush can be explained by the release of a high concentration of CO 2 from large voids in the soil Reicosky and Lindstrom, 1995;Ellert and Janzen, 1999 and the release of dissolved CO 2 from soil water caused by evaporation of water and exposure of air -water interfaces to atmospheric pressures and concentrations Reicosky and Lindstrom, 1995 as a result of soil inversion.…”
Section: Co 2 Exchange During Grassland Renovation and Regulating Facsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Several studies reported larger CO 2 flux with more immediate measurements after tillage than observed in the present study Table 5; Reicosky et al, 1997;Willems et al, 2011 . Because the flush of CO 2 from the soil occurs along with tillage, it is quite difficult Asterisk indicates statistically significant difference from before renovation *p < 0.05 .…”
Section: Co 2 Exchange During Grassland Renovation and Regulating Faccontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A comparison of three management systems: no-till barley forage; conventional till barley forage; and undisturbed perennial grass-alfalfa mixture, also found elevated soil CO 2 fluxes in the conventionally tilled forage plot compared to undisturbed perennial forage for several months after tilling (Jabro et al, 2008). The measurements of Willems et al (2011) at an adjacent site, showed that ploughed areas actually exhibited lower CO 2 emissions than undisturbed areas, apart from a brief emission peak lasting for less than one day after ploughing. This implies that soil disturbance plays a minor role and that biomass is the dominant influence on overall fluxes, thus suggesting that the difference between grass and kale fluxes in our study is primarily due to the difference in crop cover.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%