2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0038-0717(00)00053-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon dioxide emission related to chemical properties of a tropical bare soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
3
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
41
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the spatial variability analysis showed that soil temperature and moisture influenced FCO 2 only in SG-10. In some studies, soil FCO 2 was positively correlated with the organic carbon (OC) content (La Scala Jr et al, 2000b;Medeiros et al, 2011;Lenka and Lal, 2013). In this study, however, SG-10 presented a lower OC content and greater FCO 2 .…”
Section: Spatial Variabilitycontrasting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, the spatial variability analysis showed that soil temperature and moisture influenced FCO 2 only in SG-10. In some studies, soil FCO 2 was positively correlated with the organic carbon (OC) content (La Scala Jr et al, 2000b;Medeiros et al, 2011;Lenka and Lal, 2013). In this study, however, SG-10 presented a lower OC content and greater FCO 2 .…”
Section: Spatial Variabilitycontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…A spherical model for FCO 2 was also adjusted to semivariograms in studies performed by Kosugi et al (2007) and La Scala Jr et al (2000a). Furthermore, the degree of spatial dependence was moderate, which was also found by Panosso et al (2009) and La Scala Jr et al (2000b). Although studies have reported differences of range in CO 2 spatial variability during the dry and rainy periods (Kosugi et al, 2007;Ohashi and Gyokusen, 2007), in this study, the range was of 25 m for both periods.…”
Section: Spatial Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 57%
“…of the salt marsh soils. The present findings of CO 2 emissions can be compared with the results of Scala et al (2000) who measured CO 2 emissions ranged from 137 to 3455 g m -2 a -1…”
Section: Emissions Of Cosupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Long-term litter harvesting in China decreased soil respiration by 40-63% (Mao et al, 1992), and litter removal experiments in tropical forests measured a decrease in soil respiration of 28% after one year (Vasconcelos et al, 2004) and 54% after seven years (Li et al, 2004). Long-term changes in litter inputs may also influence soil respiration rates by modifying soil temperature and soil water content (Schlentner & Van Cleve, 1985), pH (Kowalenko, Ivarson & Cameron, 1978), nutrient availability (Singh & Gupta, 1977), soil carbon content, and cation exchange capacity (La Scala et al, 2000). These secondary effects of litter on soil respiration rates complicate predictions and estimates of the long-term consequences of changes to litter inputs.…”
Section: The Carbon Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%