2016
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon cost of plant nitrogen acquisition: global carbon cycle impact from an improved plant nitrogen cycle in the Community Land Model

Abstract: Plants typically expend a significant portion of their available carbon (C) on nutrient acquisition - C that could otherwise support growth. However, given that most global terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs) do not include the C cost of nutrient acquisition, these models fail to represent current and future constraints to the land C sink. Here, we integrated a plant productivity-optimized nutrient acquisition model - the Fixation and Uptake of Nitrogen Model - into one of the most widely used TBMs, the Commun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
150
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
2
150
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We propose that the CO 2 fertilization effect be quantified based on mycorrhizal type and soil nitrogen status, and that large-scale ecosystem models incorporate mycorrhizal types to account for the differences in biomass enhancement by eCO 2 . Mycorrhizae are ubiquitous, and sort predictably with plant functional type (24,34), making feasible their inclusion in models to capture this microbial influence on global biogeochemistry. Accounting for the influence of mycorrhizae will improve representation of the CO 2 fertilization effect in vegetation models, critical for projecting ecosystem responses and feedbacks to climate change.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We propose that the CO 2 fertilization effect be quantified based on mycorrhizal type and soil nitrogen status, and that large-scale ecosystem models incorporate mycorrhizal types to account for the differences in biomass enhancement by eCO 2 . Mycorrhizae are ubiquitous, and sort predictably with plant functional type (24,34), making feasible their inclusion in models to capture this microbial influence on global biogeochemistry. Accounting for the influence of mycorrhizae will improve representation of the CO 2 fertilization effect in vegetation models, critical for projecting ecosystem responses and feedbacks to climate change.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1 in the Supplement). As coupled C-N and functional root subroutines are developed for LSMs (Shi et al, 2016), and with better representation of vegetation dynamics (Fisher et al, 2015), we could imagine a dynamic allocation scheme for CLM4.5 based on whether aboveground (light) or belowground (water and nutrients) factors are limiting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In CLM4.5 employed here, the roots control water uptake but are not related to nutrient uptake, which limits the potential for dynamic responses to nutrients and CO 2 concentrations (Atkin, 2016;De Kauwe et al, 2014;Hickler et al, 2015;Sevanto and Dickman 2015). Root functionality in LSMs could be enhanced by improving parameterization within models and introducing new components such as dynamic root distribution and root functional traits linked to resource extraction (Warren et al, 2015;Brzostek et al, 2014Brzostek et al, , 2017Shi et al, 2016;Phillips et al, 2016;Iversen et al, 2017).…”
Section: Allocation Scheme: Implications For C Poolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because Noah-MP has an interactive vegetation canopy option -which predicts the leaf area index (LAI) as a function of light, temperature, and soil moisture -it is logical to augment this scheme with N limitation and realistic plant N uptake and fixation. The state-of-the-art vegetation N model is the Fixation and Uptake of Nitrogen (FUN) model of Fisher et al (2010), which is embedded into the Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES) (D. B. and the Community Land Model (CLM) (Shi et al, 2016). Modeling the impacts of agricultural management (e.g., fertilizer use) on N leaching is the strength of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) (Neitsch et al, 2011).…”
Section: Cai Et Al: Integration Of Nitrogen Dynamics Into the Noamentioning
confidence: 99%