2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.10.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon and nitrogen release from decomposing Scots pine, Norway spruce and silver birch stumps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
83
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(54 reference statements)
4
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These factors form the basis for most predictive forest wood decay models (Müller-Using and Bartsch 2009; Radtke et al 2009;Yin 1999;Zell et al 2009). These large-scale models do not account for the variation in wood decay rates at smaller temporal and spatial scales (Onega and Eickmeier 1991;Palviainen et al 2010;Van der Wal et al 2007;Woodall 2010). A large fraction of mass (and carbon) loss of woody materials actually takes place during the first decade, for which the predictions of current models have the lowest accuracy (Fahey et al 2005).…”
Section: Future Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors form the basis for most predictive forest wood decay models (Müller-Using and Bartsch 2009; Radtke et al 2009;Yin 1999;Zell et al 2009). These large-scale models do not account for the variation in wood decay rates at smaller temporal and spatial scales (Onega and Eickmeier 1991;Palviainen et al 2010;Van der Wal et al 2007;Woodall 2010). A large fraction of mass (and carbon) loss of woody materials actually takes place during the first decade, for which the predictions of current models have the lowest accuracy (Fahey et al 2005).…”
Section: Future Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The utilisation of energy biomass is useful when it is a substitute for coal and oil. However, it has also negative effects as the removal of organic matter, and thereby nutrients, could affect the future forest growth (Jacobson et al 2000, Palviainen et al 2009). In Finland, the harvesting of logging residues are recommended at comparatively higher productive sites and 30% of the removals should be left at the site thereby ensuring the nutrient availability (Äijälä et al 2010).…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stump harvesting disrupts the soil more severely than conventional site preparation practices and may further increase nutrient leaching (Aherne et al, 2012) and soil compaction (PageDumroese et al, 1998;Zabowski et al, 2008). Both stump and logging residue removal have been reported to reduce long-term C and N pools, which may affect future tree generations (Palviainen et al, 2010;Strö mgren et al, 2013), and EMF mycelia, which commonly inhabit decaying wood (Tedersoo et al, 2008;Rajala et al, 2011). As intense harvesting practices have a potential to profoundly change abiotic soil properties, they can be expected to also alter EMF communities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, combined impacts of residue and stump harvesting, especially on soil processes and biota, are still poorly understood. Compared with stem harvest only, collecting also stumps and logging residues intensifies the loss of both soil nutrient and carbon (C) stocks (Palviainen et al, 2010;Walmsley and Godbold, 2010), which may have cascading effects on soil microbiota and further on the new regenerating tree cohort.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%