2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00348.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capture–Recapture Studies Using Radio Telemetry with Premature Radio‐Tag Failure

Abstract: Summary. Radio-tags are often used in capture-recapture studies because of their high detectability. A key assumption is that radio-tags do not cease functioning during the study. Radio-tag failure before the end of a study can lead to underestimates of survival rates. We develop a model to incorporate secondary radio-tag failure data. This model was applied to chinook smolts (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) on the Columbia River, WA.Estimates of fish survival from this model were much larger than those from the sta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistical methods exist to correct survival estimates for tag failure (Cowen and Schwarz, 2005;Townsend and others, 2006), but our research indicates that these methods fail to completely remove the bias. These methods use the observed travel-time distribution to estimate the average probability of tag failure, which is then used to backcalculate true fish survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Statistical methods exist to correct survival estimates for tag failure (Cowen and Schwarz, 2005;Townsend and others, 2006), but our research indicates that these methods fail to completely remove the bias. These methods use the observed travel-time distribution to estimate the average probability of tag failure, which is then used to backcalculate true fish survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Townsend and others (2006) found that adjusted survival estimates (0.9387) changed very little from the unadjusted estimate (0.9339) when the probability of a tag being operational at downstream detection arrays was high (>98). Cowen and Schwarz (2005) found that survival estimates that do not account for tag failure have potential to be biased, especially when failure rates exceed 10 percent. Our tag failure rates were between 1-5 percent for all fish except sockeye salmon in 2008 (which still had a tag failure rate well below 10 percent).…”
Section: Results and Discussion-columbia River Fishmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cowen and Schwarz (2005) found that survival estimates that do not account for tag failure have potential to be biased, especially when failure rates exceed 10 percent. Our tag failure rates were between 1-2 percent for all fish so we feel that correcting the estimates using the tag life data would be inconsequential.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found no evidence for tag-induced mortality within the short period of our study. However, in longer-scale studies, it would be important to take tag-induced mortality, tag failure or rejection into account (Cowen & Schwarz 2005;McDonald, Amstrup & Manly 2003;Ward & David 2006). Additionally, not all sampling conditions are conducive to perfect radio-tag observation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%