2014
DOI: 10.1111/2041-210x.12202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating population size in the presence of temporary migration using a joint analysis of telemetry and capture–recapture data

Abstract: Summary1. Temporary migration -where individuals can leave and re-enter a sampled population -is a feature of many capture-mark-recapture (CMR) studies of mobile populations which, if unaccounted for, can lead to biased estimates of population capture probabilities and consequently biased estimates of population abundance. 2. We present a method for incorporating radiotelemetry data within a CMR study to eliminate bias due to temporary migration using a Bayesian state-space model. 3. Our results indicate that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimated ages were then used as a covariate to help account for how individual capture and survival probabilities varied over time. Once we had accounted for these variables, we were then able to use the estimated capture rates to calculate what fraction of the true population had been sampled and therefore, the true size of the total population in each year, as per Bird et al (2014). Full details of the model structure and data are available in the supplementary methods section (Appendix S1: Note S2).…”
Section: Bayesian State-space Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimated ages were then used as a covariate to help account for how individual capture and survival probabilities varied over time. Once we had accounted for these variables, we were then able to use the estimated capture rates to calculate what fraction of the true population had been sampled and therefore, the true size of the total population in each year, as per Bird et al (2014). Full details of the model structure and data are available in the supplementary methods section (Appendix S1: Note S2).…”
Section: Bayesian State-space Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers should attempt to deal with such problems at the study-design stage, such as increasing detection probability, increasing the number of primary periods or integrating auxiliary data into the analysis, especially observations of animals being alive or outside the study area when they may otherwise be classed as being in an unobservable state. For example, Bird et al (2014) augmented CMR data with observations based on a telemetry study which included precise observations about when animals left the CMR study area. A significant disadvantage of using ML estimation in Program MARK is its tendency for parameters to get stuck at boundary values, especiallyφ = 1 andγ ′ = 0, such that CIs are undefined.…”
Section: Bayesian Pcrd Vs Mlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, the Bayesian framework and the flexible BUGS syntax opens the possibility to easily integrate other datasets, and one priority should be to remove some of the uncertainty of the unseen state. For example, the use of other opportunistic sightings or telemetry data outside the study area (Bird et al, 2014), can partially clarify the unseen "offsite" state, and thereby help reduce the correlation in temporary emigration and survival. Please see the online tutorial at https://github.com/ faraway1nspace/PCRD_JAGS_demo, including access to the bottlenose dolphin Photo-ID data used in this study, as well as JAGS code for running select models.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Bird et al. ). Spatially explicit applications have generally focused on the contribution of telemetry data to informing the scale of individual movement in SCR models for the purposes of improving the precision and/or identifiability of parameter estimates (Sollmann et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%