2019
DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000000994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CapsoCam SV-1 Versus PillCam SB 3 in the Detection of Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Abstract: CapsoCam SV-1 detected more lesions; however, relevant bleeding sources were visualized by both capsules. Physician's satisfaction was high with both capsule systems and evaluation software. Patient's acceptance with CapsoCam SV-1 was unexpectedly high. Serious adverse events were 0% with PillCam SB 3 and 1.3% with CapsoCam SV-1.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They showed that the performance of CapsoCam SV‐1 was similar to that of a forward‐view SBCE system. Zwinger et al . conducted a head‐to‐head comparison between CapsoCam SV‐1 and PillCam SB3 in a randomized prospective study enrolling patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB).…”
Section: Current Status Of Sbce Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They showed that the performance of CapsoCam SV‐1 was similar to that of a forward‐view SBCE system. Zwinger et al . conducted a head‐to‐head comparison between CapsoCam SV‐1 and PillCam SB3 in a randomized prospective study enrolling patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB).…”
Section: Current Status Of Sbce Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They showed that the performance of CapsoCam SV-1 was similar to that of a forwardview SBCE system. Zwinger et al 18 conducted a head-to-head comparison between CapsoCam SV-1 and PillCam SB3 in a randomized prospective study enrolling patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB). They reported that CapsoCam SV-1 detected more bleeding lesions (31/79) and had a higher diagnostic yield (39.7%) as compared with PillCam SB3 (26/75 and 34.6%, respectively).…”
Section: Current Status Of Sbce Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serious adverse events were 0% with PillCam SB3 and 1.3% with CapsoCam SV-1. 15 CE is superior to other techniques in diagnosing the source of bleeding. A pooled analysis of 14 studies including 396 patients showed a diagnostic yield of 56% for CE versus 26% (p = 0.00001) for push enteroscopy.…”
Section: Clinical Evidence For Use Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleedingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Literature on axial and panoramic SBCE in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) is limited . We carried out a retrospective study on 94 patients with overt OGIB where findings on gastroduodenoscopy were inadequate to explain presentation (SBCE after a median 28 days).…”
Section: Diagnostic Yield (Dy) Of Panoramic and Axial Small Bowel Capmentioning
confidence: 99%