2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2907925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CapsFall: Fall Detection Using Ultra-Wideband Radar and Capsule Network

Abstract: Radar technology for at home health-care has many advantages such as safety, reliability, privacy-preserving, and contact-less sensing nature. Detecting falls using radar has recently gained attention in smart health care. In this paper, CapsFall, a new method for fall detection using an ultra-wideband radar that leverages the recent deep learning advances is proposed. To this end, a radar time series is derived from the radar back-scattered matrix and its time-frequency representation is obtained and used as … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ with fivefold cross-validation (AC = 91.1%), compared with the results obtained in CapsFall proposed approach in Sadreazami et al [38], in which only the TF domain (spectrogram) was used as input for a capsule module network (automatic feature learning) to differentiate fall and non-fall activities. The comparison is done only between the Caps-Fall and the first-stage classification of the proposed method to compare performance regarding the classification of two classes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ with fivefold cross-validation (AC = 91.1%), compared with the results obtained in CapsFall proposed approach in Sadreazami et al [38], in which only the TF domain (spectrogram) was used as input for a capsule module network (automatic feature learning) to differentiate fall and non-fall activities. The comparison is done only between the Caps-Fall and the first-stage classification of the proposed method to compare performance regarding the classification of two classes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In work by the same authors [37], the features were learned automatically using DCNN from the radar time series data. The authors [38] also proposed a capsule network-based fall detection (CapsFall) method in which the TR representation of the radar time series was fed into a CapsFall method for automatic feature learning. Du et al [39] introduced a three-dimensional (3D) DL framework for human motion analysis in which reflected radar echoes were transformed into range-Doppler points to obtain the discrete representation of motion trajectory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature [ 37 , 38 ] have discussed the usage of radar technology for detecting falls. Study [ 37 ], proposes CapsFall, based on Ultra-Wideband (UWB) radar which relies on multi-level feature learning from radar time-frequency representations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed solution outperforms the other methods. Paper [ 38 ] propose a learning model that combines convolutional layers and convolutional long short term memory (ConvLSTM) to extract robust spatiotemporal features for fall detection by using monostatic radar. In a word, UWB requires some specific hardware devices to detect falls and is not common in general households compared with WiFi devices.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neural network-based classification methods, in particular, CNN (Convolutional Neural Network) and autoencoders have attracted a lot of attention and showed to generally outperform conventional classifiers in terms of classification accuracy, at the price of additional training complexity. H. Sadreazami et al [23] proposed a CNN-based Capsule network to identify the fall accidents through ultra-wide band radar and the results indicated that it over performed SVM with different kernel [24] also pointed that SVM plus 2-D PCA (Principle Component Analysis) and CNN (RadarNet) showed better performance than other classifiers in activity classification, subject recognition and outdoor localization. S. Gurbuz et al [25] compared the walking pattern recognition of three different radar sensors and one sonar using a broad range of features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%