2019
DOI: 10.1002/soej.12328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capitalization of Flood Insurance and Risk Perceptions in Housing Prices: An Empirical Agent‐Based Model Approach

Abstract: Federally regulated or insured lenders in the United States are mandated to require flood insurance on properties that are located in areas at high risk of flooding. Despite the existence of this mandatory flood insurance requirement, take‐up rates for flood insurance have been low, and the federal government's exposure to uninsured property losses from flooding remains substantial. Meanwhile, the value of capital at risk varies significantly with flood events and changing risk perceptions, which necessitates … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(79 reference statements)
0
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common option within the SH group is to employ empirical water-depth damage functions, often for specific building (Dubbelboer et al, 2017;Haer et al, 2020;Han & Peng, 2019). The MR ABMs treat vulnerability simplistically, for example, calculating damages as a fixed percent of property value averaged for the whole floodplain (de Koning et al, 2017Koning et al, , 2019. Moreover, in flood-ABMs, agents can decrease their vulnerability, undertaking structural CCA actions such as elevating a house or installing flood barriers, which is the focus in the SH literature (17:18 papers) (see 3.2.2, Table 2).…”
Section: Risk Components In Flood-abmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most common option within the SH group is to employ empirical water-depth damage functions, often for specific building (Dubbelboer et al, 2017;Haer et al, 2020;Han & Peng, 2019). The MR ABMs treat vulnerability simplistically, for example, calculating damages as a fixed percent of property value averaged for the whole floodplain (de Koning et al, 2017Koning et al, , 2019. Moreover, in flood-ABMs, agents can decrease their vulnerability, undertaking structural CCA actions such as elevating a house or installing flood barriers, which is the focus in the SH literature (17:18 papers) (see 3.2.2, Table 2).…”
Section: Risk Components In Flood-abmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Real estate is a common actor in MR flood-ABMs (Chandra-Putra & Andrews, 2019; de Koning et al, 2017Koning et al, , 2019 de Koning & Filatova, 2020;Filatova, 2015). The Real estate agent observes successful trades and identifies changes in market conditions, learning from hundreds of recent sales in the simulated decentralized housing market.…”
Section: Actors In Flood-risk Management and Their Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parte-se da premissa que o capital em perigo varia com a frequência das cheias, exigindo mecanismos económicos que estabilizem os factos ligados à dinâmica dos eventos (Koning et al, 2019). Tendo em conta a cada vez maior frequência das cheias, devido às alterações climáticas e suas consequências, bem como aos erros de ordenamento do território, propõe-se rever o valor da apólice e os fatores de risco a contemplar (Pralle, 2019).…”
Section: Geografiaunclassified
“…Para que o seguro cumpra essas funções com sucesso, o preço da política e as opções da apólice devem ser baseadas em informações precisas das evidências (Rumson & Hallett, 2019). Ao existirem dados sobre o histórico das ocorrências de cheias, isso permite que as seguradoras reavaliem as classificações do processo perigoso (Koning et al, 2019;Rumson & Hallett, 2019;Zêzere et al, 2014). As fontes da imprensa periódica (IP) são vistas como essenciais para as seguradoras reavaliarem a apólice do seguro (Grosso, Dias, Costa, Santos, & Garrett, 2015) por conterem os dados sobre as consequências.…”
Section: Geografiaunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation