1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4347(98)00307-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capillary electrophoresis of subcellular-sized particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CE is a relatively nonperturbing method allowing the structure-dependent electrophoretic separation of monodisperse or polydisperse mixtures of small molecules [339][340][341], macromolecules [342][343][344][345], polymers [346][347][348][349] and colloids [350], up to nanoparticles [351][352][353][354] and liposomes [355], even bacteria [350,356] and viruses, in various modes of gentle separation techniques using nonaqueous or aqueous buffers with coated or uncoated capillary columns. The small volume of the analyte needed in CE experiments has made possible the measurement of the cellular contents (native proteins [357], specific fluorescent-labelled or-induced proteins [358], metabolites), the monitoring of single cells [359,360] or bacteria communications [361].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CE is a relatively nonperturbing method allowing the structure-dependent electrophoretic separation of monodisperse or polydisperse mixtures of small molecules [339][340][341], macromolecules [342][343][344][345], polymers [346][347][348][349] and colloids [350], up to nanoparticles [351][352][353][354] and liposomes [355], even bacteria [350,356] and viruses, in various modes of gentle separation techniques using nonaqueous or aqueous buffers with coated or uncoated capillary columns. The small volume of the analyte needed in CE experiments has made possible the measurement of the cellular contents (native proteins [357], specific fluorescent-labelled or-induced proteins [358], metabolites), the monitoring of single cells [359,360] or bacteria communications [361].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although flow cytometry was historically used first to detect individual organelles [9,10], CE has the additional analytical advantage of being able to separate organelles based on their electrophoretic mobilities [11][12][13][14]. In general, the electrophoretic mobility of a particle stems from its size [12,14,19] and surface characteristics [13,19], which makes CE useful for comparing the size or surface characteristics of individually detected biological species, such as proteins [15], mitochondria [8,16], nuclei [17], and acidic organelles [18]. The size and surface characteristics of these particles may be highly heterogeneous, making it extremely important to analyze samples with a sufficient number of individual species so that an accurate statistical description is observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. 31,32 Therefore, the main driving force for the larger-sized negatively charged Au NPs 33 to move faster toward the anodic end (detector side) was probably their more pronounced relaxation effect 20,[34][35][36] during the application of the REPSM. In addition, I noticed that the peak widths of the signals in the electropherograms for both sizes of Au NPs were reduced slightly when the REPSM voltage processes were applied, suggesting that the Au NPs in the sample underwent stacking during the application of the REPSM; the finding is consistent with those of previous reports.…”
Section: Mechanism Of On-line Concentration and Separation Of Au Npsmentioning
confidence: 99%