2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00182-020-00718-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capacity precommitment, communication, and collusive pricing: theoretical benchmark and experimental evidence

Abstract: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While these conditions are implemented between-subjects, additionally "cheap talk" or "no communication" after capacity but before price choices is implemented as a within-subjects variation. However, as cheap talk as such does not affect the threat of losses, we focus only on the data of conditions without cheap talk in the following (for an analysis of cheap talk versus no communication see Güth et al, 2018). The considered variations allow for a thorough analysis of possibly path-dependent price and capacity choices in multi-stage games.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these conditions are implemented between-subjects, additionally "cheap talk" or "no communication" after capacity but before price choices is implemented as a within-subjects variation. However, as cheap talk as such does not affect the threat of losses, we focus only on the data of conditions without cheap talk in the following (for an analysis of cheap talk versus no communication see Güth et al, 2018). The considered variations allow for a thorough analysis of possibly path-dependent price and capacity choices in multi-stage games.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%