“…In recent years, a new approach to linguistic justice has been proposed (though not yet fully developed) in which linguistic disadvantage is defined in terms of what people are able to be and do in a given language, rather in terms of what they can receive (see Brando and Morales-Gálvez, 2021; Carey, 2019; Lewis, 2017; Shorten, 2017). In this application of the capabilities approach developed by Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum, resources or means should be viewed as only part of the story, since ‘if the goal is to establish conditions that provide people with truly fair opportunities to use and sustain their respective languages, then additional ‘conversion’ factors, for example the constraining influence of implicit social norms and conventions, also need to be considered and addressed’ (Lewis, 2017: 604).…”