2002
DOI: 10.1017/s0021859602002575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canopy morphology and nutritional quality traits as potential grazing value indicators for Lolium perenne varieties

Abstract: Twelve perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) varieties of different ploidy and maturity classifications were compared under a frequent cutting management in their second harvest year, equivalent to the simulated rotational grazing system employed in UK testing protocols. Varietal differences in canopy structure (proportion of lamina, green leaf mass, sward surface height, extended tiller height, bulk density) and in herbage nutritive value factors (water-soluble carbohydrate content and proportion of linoleic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
102
7
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
14
102
7
2
Order By: Relevance
“…WSC is a trait that varies between cultivars (Gilliland et al, 2002) and ranged from 143 to 253 g/kg DM in the current study. The levels peaked during the reproductive growth phase and declined as the season progressed, which is in agreement with Miller et al (2001).…”
Section: Sward Chemical Compositionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…WSC is a trait that varies between cultivars (Gilliland et al, 2002) and ranged from 143 to 253 g/kg DM in the current study. The levels peaked during the reproductive growth phase and declined as the season progressed, which is in agreement with Miller et al (2001).…”
Section: Sward Chemical Compositionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In order to maximise GDMI, grazing animals need to be offered a sward with characteristics that allow rapid consumption -E-mail: michael.odonovan@teagasc.ie (O'Donovan et al, 2010). Sward structural differences between cultivars have been shown to influence herbage intake (Gilliland et al, 2002;Smit et al, 2005a) and may be more important than organic matter digestibility (OMD) in determining GDMI and milk yield (O'Donovan and Delaby, 2005). For example, the voluntary GDMI of the leaf fraction is 20% higher than that of the stem fraction (Laredo and Minson, 1975), suggesting that variations in cultivar leaf proportion will influence intake and animal performance (Gowen et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En otros estudios, el pasto Ryegrass presentó la mayor concentración de ácido linolénico (61 %), seguido por el pasto Festuca (55,9 %), el Azul orchoro (51,8 %) y el Timothy (49,9 %) (Glasser et al 2013). También se han reportado diferencias en las proporciones de ácido linoleico y linolénico (C18:3) en los AG de 12 variedades de Ryegrass (Gilliland et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…A variation of 20% for WSC concentration among six diploid ryegrasses was found to be consistent over several years (Smit, 2006), the largest variation among cultivars was found during summer, in July and August. Tetraploid cultivars generally had a higher WSC concentration than diploid cultivars (Smith et al 2001;Gilliland et al 2002). DMD concentration declined during summer due to the influence of higher temperatures, however, high WSC lines exhibited fewer declines in DMD than the lines that did not accumulate as much WSC.…”
Section: Environmental Effectsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…There is, however, indirect evidence that higher WSC in ryegrass may result in improved animal performance (Lee et al, 2001;Evans et al, 2011;Miller et al, 2001). Tetraploid ryegrass varieties have higher levels of WSC compared to diploids (Jung et al, 1996;Smith et al 2001;Gilliland et al 2002). There are two large scale animal production trials in which tetraploid and diploid varieties were compared (Castle and Watson, 1971;Connolly et al, 1977).…”
Section: Conclusion and Grass Breeding Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%