2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-005-0015-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cannabinoid CB1 receptors are involved in motivational effects of nicotine in rats

Abstract: The endocannabinoids are a necessary component in both the perception by rats of the motivational value of nicotine and the short-term capacity of nicotine-paired conditioned stimuli to elicit approach behaviour. In contrast, the acute blockade of CB1 receptors no longer impairs the long-term control of behaviour by nicotine-associated environmental cues. These data provide support to the notion that the blockade of CB1 receptors can oppose tobacco dependence, withdrawal and even relapse, though the time windo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
88
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
11
88
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In preclinical studies, the CB1 antagonist rimonabant reduces or blocks both the intravenous self-administration of nicotine and the development and expression of nicotine-induced conditioned place preferences in rats (170,173). Rimonabant also reduces the motivational impact of drug-related cues or environments on nicotine-seeking behavior (174)(175)(176).…”
Section: Nicotinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In preclinical studies, the CB1 antagonist rimonabant reduces or blocks both the intravenous self-administration of nicotine and the development and expression of nicotine-induced conditioned place preferences in rats (170,173). Rimonabant also reduces the motivational impact of drug-related cues or environments on nicotine-seeking behavior (174)(175)(176).…”
Section: Nicotinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One week before the beginning of the experiments, all the animals were foodrestricted (20 g/day) until the end of the study. This was carried out because food restriction has been reported to enhance the rewarding effects of drugs of abuse (Carr 2002), including nicotine (Donny et al, 1998), and the study on which our protocol is based uses a foodrestriction regimen (Forget et al, 2005). Experiments were subject to institutional review and conducted in accordance with the Veterinary Authority of Basel-Stadt (Basel, Switzerland).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, rimonabant has been found to decrease nicotine self-administration (Cohen et al 2002;Kodas et al 2007), cue-induced reinstatement of nicotine seeking (Cohen et al 2004;De Vries et al 2005), and nicotine-conditioned place preferences (Forget et al 2005;Le Foll and Goldberg 2004). The operant discriminative stimulus (S D ) effects of nicotine do not appear to be affected by pretreatment with rimonabant (Cohen et al 2002;Le Foll and Goldberg 2004;Zaniewska et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%