2018
DOI: 10.1177/1040638718789231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canine mammary tumor risk is associated with polymorphisms in RAD51 and STK11 genes

Abstract: Cancer is a complex disease involving genetic and phenotypic changes. Several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been associated with the risk of breast cancer development in women; however, little is known regarding their influence on canine mammary tumor risk. We assessed the influence of SNPs in genes related to human breast cancer susceptibility, with respect to the risk of development of mammary tumors in dogs. Sixty-seven canine SNPs in proto-oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, genes involved in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
16
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Three missense variants were identified, STK11 c.C109T (p.P37S), STK11 c.A286G (p.M96V), and STK11 c.T293C (p.F98S), all of which appear to play a role in CMT risk. Our findings suggest that STK11 is a CMT susceptibility gene, corroborating a similar claim in a recent publication by Canadas et al [68]. Canadas and colleagues suggested that the minor allele (T) of rs22928814, which lies within an intron of STK11, was associated with an increased risk of CMT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Three missense variants were identified, STK11 c.C109T (p.P37S), STK11 c.A286G (p.M96V), and STK11 c.T293C (p.F98S), all of which appear to play a role in CMT risk. Our findings suggest that STK11 is a CMT susceptibility gene, corroborating a similar claim in a recent publication by Canadas et al [68]. Canadas and colleagues suggested that the minor allele (T) of rs22928814, which lies within an intron of STK11, was associated with an increased risk of CMT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Some ESR1 genetic differences were described between different dog breeds known to be at high and at low risk of mammary tumor development; furthermore, an association between ESR1 variation and the susceptibility to mammary tumors was described in a cohort of English Springer Spaniels [31,32]. However, in a recent investigation, our group could not confirm a relationship between ESR1 genetic profile and the risk of development of mammary tumors [33]. On the other hand, genetic variations in canine COMT gene (which encodes catechol-O-methyltransferase, an enzyme involved in estrogens metabolism through inactivation of carcinogenic catechol estrogens) has not been proved to influence susceptibility to canine mammary tumors.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Each tumour was evaluated for the mode of growth and classified as either expansive, when it was delimited with a capsule; infiltrative, when not delimited by a capsule, but without signs of vascular invasion or lymph node metastasis; and invasive in the presence of vascular invasion or lymph node metastases. In cases of dogs with multiple malignant tumours, a reference lesion was assigned for the statistical study, as previously reported …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%