2019
DOI: 10.1177/0300985819859872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canine Ependymoma: Diagnostic Criteria and Common Pitfalls

Abstract: Reports of canine ependymoma are generally restricted to single case reports with tumor incidence estimated at 2% to 3% of primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors. While most commonly reported in the lateral ventricle, tumors can occur anywhere in the ventricular system and in extraventricular locations. Rosettes and pseudorosettes are a common histologic feature; however, these features can be mimicked by other CNS neoplasms. Thirty-seven potential ependymoma cases were identified in a retrospective datab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6,9 This utility was confirmed in a case series of canine ependymomas in which sparse OLIG2 immunolabeling was recorded in ependymal neoplasms compared to oligodendroglioma, which had robust immunolabeling. 8 This immunolabeling specificity is in direct contrast to our study, in which we found a wide and diverse OLIG2 immunolabeling pattern among feline ependymomas. This immunolabeling pattern appears to be unique among species in which neoplastic ependymal OLIG2 immunolabeling has been studied.…”
contrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6,9 This utility was confirmed in a case series of canine ependymomas in which sparse OLIG2 immunolabeling was recorded in ependymal neoplasms compared to oligodendroglioma, which had robust immunolabeling. 8 This immunolabeling specificity is in direct contrast to our study, in which we found a wide and diverse OLIG2 immunolabeling pattern among feline ependymomas. This immunolabeling pattern appears to be unique among species in which neoplastic ependymal OLIG2 immunolabeling has been studied.…”
contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…2,10 OLIG2 immunolabeling is scant in both human and canine ependymoma, with <1% of neoplastic cell immunolabeling in a canine ependymoma study. 7,8 There are no reports of the pattern of OLIG2 immunolabeling in feline ependymoma. Here we describe the clinicopathologic findings and the GFAP and OLIG2 immunolabeling features of 19 cases of feline ependymoma.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histologically, tumors typically form papillary and frond-like arborizing cords and trabeculae supported by a variably dense fibrovascular stroma (Figures 3C–E). Less commonly, areas of more sheet-like growth admixed with pseudorosettes can be found in these tumors (146). Unless invasion into the adjacent parenchyma is present, there are generally few changes in the adjacent tissue and often limited to mild gliosis and edema.…”
Section: Choroid Plexus Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The immunopositivity for GFAP and Olig2 is highly supportive of a glioma 6 18. Morphological features of canine ependymomas, such as rosettes and pseudorosettes, were not present in the current case; further, although canine ependymomas can express GFAP immunolabelling, Olig2 immunolabelling is rare and scarce 19. Similarly, the papillary fronds typical of choroid plexus tumours were not present in our case,20 and although cytokeratin immunolabelling can occur in choroid plexus tumours, Olig2 is a glial marker that is not expressed by these tumours 9 21.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%