2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.fgb.2019.103287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Candida glabrata peroxiredoxins, Tsa1 and Tsa2, and sulfiredoxin, Srx1, protect against oxidative damage and are necessary for virulence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…C. glabrata, on the other hand, resists oxidative stress by producing Srx1 (sulfiredoxin) and two peroxiredoxins (Tsa1 and Tsa2). TSA1 and 2 are expressed in the presence of neutrophils [ 80 ].…”
Section: The Virulence Of Candida Sppmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C. glabrata, on the other hand, resists oxidative stress by producing Srx1 (sulfiredoxin) and two peroxiredoxins (Tsa1 and Tsa2). TSA1 and 2 are expressed in the presence of neutrophils [ 80 ].…”
Section: The Virulence Of Candida Sppmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the relationship between acetic acid stress tolerance and some target genes remains unclear, genes RGS2 , SIP18 , SRX1 , and YDJ1 were proved to contribute to oxidative stress tolerance [ 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 ]. To explore the roles of Rim15 target genes in relieving oxidative stress, the growth performance of the deletion strains lacking Rim15 target genes was evaluated with the treatment of 5 mM H 2 O 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, different Prxs might have different functions in the cell and not necessarily all Prxs are induced equally by oxidative stress. In Candida glabrata and S. cerevisiae , one Prx was described as the main Prx against ROS, while another was proposed to be a backup [ 16 , 31 ]. Alternatively, Prx-2 and Prx-3 might fulfil other functions, since Prxs were also reported to contribute to genome stability or function as chaperones reviewed by de Oliveira et al [ 8 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%