Cancer survivor inspiratory muscle training: systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis

Abstract

BackgroundThe long-term impact of cancer treatment is associated with respiratory dysfunction and physical fitness impairment. Although inspiratory muscle training (IMT) has been shown as an effective exercise therapy in cancer survivors, there is no evidence on the optimal dose, application moment nor specific population effects of this intervention. The main objective of this meta-analysis is to analyse the effects of IMT on pulmonary function, physical fitness and quality of life (QoL) in cancer survivors.MethodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis was preregistered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) register and conducted according to the Preferred Reporting for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis statement. We used a Bayesian multilevel random-effects meta-analysis model to pool the data. Multilevel metaregression models were used to examine the conditional effects of our covariates. Convergence and model fit were evaluated through specific model parameters. Sensitivity analyses removing influential cases and using a frequentist approach were carried out.ResultsPooled data showed that IMT intervention is effective to improve pulmonary function (standardised mean difference=0.53, 95% credible interval 0.13 to 0.94, SE=0.19). However, IMT did not present statistically significant results on physical fitness and QoL. Metaregression analyses found that the type of cancer, the moment of application and the evaluation tool used had significant moderation effects on pulmonary function.ConclusionIMT could be an important part in the management of side effects suffered by cancer survivors. Considering the current evidence, this intervention is highly recommended in patients diagnosed with oesophageal and lung cancers. IMT may provide superior benefits before the biological treatment and after the surgery.PROSPERO registration number304909.

Effects of motor imagery and action observation on respiratory function in mild smokers: a randomized single-blind controlled pilot trial

“…Physical training has been widely used in respiratory rehabilitation. In fact, some systematic reviews have shown that respiratory muscle training improves several pulmonary function parameters and maximal static pressures in some clinical populations such as patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [26], lung cancer survivors [27], asthma [28], obstructive sleep apnea [29], or tobacco smokers [30,31]. Therefore, we believe that the addition of mental practice along with the performance of respiratory muscle training could have an impact on these clinical populations.…”

Potential Therapeutic Role of Respiratory Muscle Training in Dyspnea Management of Cancer Survivors: A Narrative Review

“…In patients with cardiopulmonary diseases, the scientific clinical literature on the efficacy of RMT in reducing dyspnea is compelling [ 19 , 45 - 47 , 49 , 51 ]. However, in patients with cancer, the evidence for RMT efficacy is preliminary, insufficient and with many gaps [ 10 - 13 , 65 ]. Randomized controlled trials of RMT interventions are warranted in patients with different types of cancer and dyspnea.…”

Prehabilitation in Adults Undergoing Cancer Surgery: A Comprehensive Review on Rationale, Methodology, and Measures of Effectiveness

“…In a recent systematic review, Meneses-Echavez et al reported that the minimum clinically important difference in strength is between 5 and 6.5 kg [14]. Regarding functional outcomes, the effect of inspiratory muscle training can be measured by inspiratory muscle pressures, forced vital capacity, and forced expiratory volume in 1 s [86].…”