2015
DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.5.666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancer Risk among Population near Nuclear Power Plants in Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These rates for leukaemia seen in NPP area are very similar to the rates of Non-nuclear cancer locations in India, which clear indicated that there is no excess in leukaemia rates in population near to NPP locations. This finding is similar with previous research studies such as [13][14][15][16][17] found a negative association of exposure of radiation with childhood and adult leukaemia. Similarly, we seen very few thyroid cases in all NPP Locations , which is similar to findings of [18] which did not find an association between risk of thyroid cancer and the proximity of residence near power plants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These rates for leukaemia seen in NPP area are very similar to the rates of Non-nuclear cancer locations in India, which clear indicated that there is no excess in leukaemia rates in population near to NPP locations. This finding is similar with previous research studies such as [13][14][15][16][17] found a negative association of exposure of radiation with childhood and adult leukaemia. Similarly, we seen very few thyroid cases in all NPP Locations , which is similar to findings of [18] which did not find an association between risk of thyroid cancer and the proximity of residence near power plants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This study was the first ever attempt at reanalysis of a major epidemiologic study in Korea. Before the reanalysis, several rounds of correspondence were exchanged about the shortcomings and interpretations of the results, including comparability of control group especially due to the differences in education status, potentials of selection bias from excluding cancer patients of already exposed, problems of mechanical selection processes for covariates in multivariate modelling, interpretation of the gender differences, and study design limits of targeting adults only population [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ]. However, most of the problems stemming from the design could not be solved by the reanalysis, but only checked for their potentials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The baseline surveys were performed 14 to 28 years after the NPPs had opened. The original authors’ contention that there was no need for further epidemiologic study was also challenged [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, some ( 6 7 8 ) demand an extended cohort study, putting forward a claim that this result should be interpreted in relation to the radiation exposure of NPP residents ( 9 ). However, it is doubtful that we need to extend the follow-up duration and reanalyze the collected data because of the following reasons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%