Cancer mortality and morbidity among plutonium workers at the Sellafield plant of British Nuclear Fuels

Abstract

SummaryThe mortality of all 14 319 workers employed at the Sellafield plant of British Nuclear Fuels between 1947 and 1975 was studied up to the end of 1992, and cancer incidence was examined from 1971 to 1986, in relation to their exposures to plutonium and to external radiation. The cancer mortality rate was 5% lower than that of England and Wales and 3% less than that of Cumbria. The significant excesses of deaths from cancer of the pleura and thyroid found in an earlier study persist with further follow-up (14 observed, 4.0 expected for pleura; 6 observed, 2.2 expected for thyroid). All of the deaths from pleural cancer were among radiation workers. For neither site was there a significant association between the risk of the cancer and accumulated radiation dose. There were significant deficits of deaths from cancers of mouth and pharynx, liver and gall bladder, and larynx and leukaemia when compared with the national rates. Among all radiation workers, there was a significant positive association between accumulated external radiation dose and mortality from cancers of ill-defined and secondary sites (10-year lag, P = 0.04), leukaemia (no lag, P = 0.03; 2-year lag, P = 0.05), multiple myeloma (20-year lag, P = 0.02), all lymphatic and haematopoietic cancers (20-year lag, P = 0.03) and all causes of death combined (20-year lag, P = 0.008). Among plutonium workers, there were significant excesses of deaths from cancer of the breast (6 observed, 2.6 expected) and ill-defined and secondary cancers (29 observed, 20.1 expected). No significant positive trends were observed between the risk of deaths from cancers of any specific site, or all cancers combined, and cumulative plutonium and external radiation doses. For no cancer site was there a significant excess of cancer registrations compared with rates for England and Wales. Analysis of trends in cancer incidence showed significant increases in risk with cumulative plutonium plus external radiation doses for all lymphatic and haematopoietic neoplasms for 0-, 10-and 20-year lag periods. Taken as a whole, our findings do not suggest that workers at Sellafield who have been exposed to plutonium are at an overall significantly increased risk of cancer compared with other radiation workers.Keywords: radiation; plutonium; nuclear workers; cohort; mortality; cancer incidence 1288British Journal of Cancer (1999) 79(7/8), 1288-1301 © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign Article no. bjoc.1998 Received 18 May 1998 Accepted 27 May 1998 Correspondence to: PG Smith *Present address: Department of Medical Statistics and Evaluation, Imperial College School of Medicine, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK. Cancer risks among plutonium workers 1289British Journal of Cancer (1999) 79(7/8), 1288-1301 © Cancer Research Campaign 1999 plutonium since it was first produced in the plant. The most likely route of exposure has been through inhalation, and monitoring has been conducted principally through the analysis of urine samples collected from workers. These monitoring data have been ass...

The non-Hodgkin lymphomas: A review of the epidemiologic literature

“…No significant associations were reported in Sellafield, Atomic Weapons Establishment, Hanford, Japanese, or combined US, UK and Canadian cohorts. [305][306][307][308][309][310][311][312] Furthermore, there were no trends in NHL risk based on cumulative radiation dose in these cohorts. Other studies have reported no significant associations among US military personnel who participated in atmospheric nuclear weapons tests, 313 participants in the UK atmospheric nuclear weapons tests, 314 residents living near nuclear installations, 315,316 uranium miners, 317 dental workers 318 or cohort members of the National Dose Registry of Canada.…”

The cancer epidemiology of radiation

“…Carpenter et al (1998) examined a large cohort of British nuclear industry workers who had been monitored for internal exposures and found that certain patterns of monitoring may be associated with particular cancers; however, the measures of exposure were relatively crude. Omar et al (1999) studied the group of workers exposed to plutonium at the Sellafield nuclear installation in Britain for whom assessed organ-specific doses due to plutonium were available, and concluded that the plutonium workers were not at an increased risk of cancer when compared with other radiation workers. Following the finding of a statistically significant association between prostatic cancer mortality and external radiation dose among UK Atomic Energy Authority workers, which was stronger for those monitored for internally deposited radionuclides (Beral et al, 1985), Rooney et al (1993) conducted a nested case-control study of prostate cancer among these workers.…”

Revue de l’état des connaissances des effets du tritium sur la santé et l’environnement au Canada – un outil pour orienter la surveillance réglementaire

“…La principale conclusion qui peut être tirée de la revue des études épidémiologiques menées sur les travailleurs du secteur nucléaire dans le cadre de ce projet est : l'impossibilité de faire une inférence directe entre l'augmentation du risque de cancer et l'exposition au tritium des travailleurs de l'United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA) (Beral et al, 1985 ;Fraser et al, 1993 ;Atkinson et al, 2004Atkinson et al, , 2007, de l'Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) (Beral et al, 1988 ;Johnson et al, 1999) ou des sites de Sellafield (Smith et Douglas, 1986 ;Douglas et al, 1994 ;Omar et al, 1999), Capenhurst (McGeoghegan et Binks, 2000 ou Chapelcross (McGeoghegan et Binks, 2001), en raison de l'absence de données dosimétriques portant expressément sur le tritium. Par contre, il a été mis en évidence que, si les données dosimétriques concernant le tritium des travailleurs du site de Capenhurst, lesquels auraient subi une exposition considérable au tritium, pouvaient être rendues disponibles, cette cohorte fournirait de précieux renseignements.…”