2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-009-1018-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancer from Both Sides Now: Combining Personal and Research Perspectives on Survivorship

Abstract: Cancer survivorship is increasingly a situation of chronic disease management that needs to be integrated with the context of broader health and well-being. This perspective paper combines personal experiences and a professional research program to address the complexities of long-term management of cancer and integrated care and the importance of psychological distress and psychological growth expressed in diverse pathways of survivorship. The role of age is addressed as partially defining the extent and natu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the absence of clear guidelines as to how their ongoing care will be managed and monitored, these feelings of uncertainty are often amplified. Internationally, there is currently a generally a lack of consensus as to whether long term cancer survivors ought to routinely have their surveillance managed by their treating oncologists or primary care providers (Blank, 2009). In Australia, oncologists have traditionally provided cancer followed-up and surveillance (Brennan & Jefford, 2009), whilst general practitioners have often played a more minor role assuming overall responsibility for the management of the person's comorbidities (Mitchell, 2008).…”
Section: Coordination Between Specialist and Generalist Providersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of clear guidelines as to how their ongoing care will be managed and monitored, these feelings of uncertainty are often amplified. Internationally, there is currently a generally a lack of consensus as to whether long term cancer survivors ought to routinely have their surveillance managed by their treating oncologists or primary care providers (Blank, 2009). In Australia, oncologists have traditionally provided cancer followed-up and surveillance (Brennan & Jefford, 2009), whilst general practitioners have often played a more minor role assuming overall responsibility for the management of the person's comorbidities (Mitchell, 2008).…”
Section: Coordination Between Specialist and Generalist Providersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatments for side effects and late effects are intended to help patients adjust to their 'new normal', however, patients are increasingly expressing their dissatisfaction with the effectiveness of these treatments alone, and frustration with the lack of appreciation for gaps that exist in some areas such as mental health, fertility, and legal/financial issues (Ehrenreich, 2001, Sulik 2011, King, 2008, Blank, 2009. Driving much of the survivor activism is younger survivor advocates in organizations such as the LiveStrong, Stupid Cancer and Young Survival Coalition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, long-term cancer survivors (LTS) face unique challenges to their health that differ significantly from those faced by patients undergoing cancer treatment (Blank, 2009). Both cancer and its treatments take an enduring toll on the minds, bodies, and spirits of LTS (Lund, Schmiegelow, Rechnitzer, & Johansen, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%