Canada, the United States and Arctic Sovereignty: Architecture Without Building?

James, Carolyn C.; James, Patrick

doi:10.1080/02722011.2014.914048

Cited by 6 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 12 publications

(5 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Department of State, Canada, 2021). Security and trade interests are core to many specific bilateral concerns such as global warming climate commitments, energy independence, natural resource management, drug trafficking, and border security (Bridges, 2013; Gattinger, 2012; James & James, 2014; Karkkainen, 2013; Macfarlane, 2019). The U.S. State Department reports that the two countries are the largest export markets to the other with Canada being the leading foreign supplier of energy to the U.S. Additionally, the two countries jointly develop reliability standards for the integrated electricity grid they operate together.…”

Section: Allies and Friends Of Democracymentioning

confidence: 99%

International Reactions to the Capitol Attack of January 6th: A Media Frames Analysis

Boone

Taylor

Gallant

2022

American Behavioral Scientist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

On January 6, 2021, the United States experienced an insurrection at the United States Capitol that was framed in varying and complex ways by traditional U.S. allies, competing nations, and adversaries. This manuscript examines the statements of foreign leaders, international media reports, and social media posts through a media framing analysis. Thousands of pages of press reports from countries, including the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Canada, Australia, Mexico, Israel, Russia, and China, formed different views of the insurrection. There were concerns about U.S. democracy, questions about U.S. leadership, and expressions of each nation’s self-interest in the transactional nature of their own economical, ideological or political interests. Operationalizing a media frame analysis, this essay examines the January 6th events to suggest that global reactions to democracy are bolstered, ridiculed, and, frequently, contested internationally.

show abstract

Section: Allies and Friends Of Democracymentioning

confidence: 99%

International Reactions to the Capitol Attack of January 6th: A Media Frames Analysis

Boone

Taylor

Gallant

2022

American Behavioral Scientist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Canada by contrast claims that the waters of the Canadian Archipelago have historically been internal waters and are exempt from the enforcement of Article 38 by Article 8(2), which covers pre-existing claims (U.S. Department of Defense 2016). Though the dispute over navigation rights between the close partners is not likely to spark conflict, it does have the possibility to cause disruptions in the future between the two as traffic on the NWP increases (Lajeunesse 2018;Schulze 2017;James and James 2014).…”

Section: Northern Sea Routementioning

confidence: 99%

“…This is exemplified by the individual Arctic policies and regional actions taken by two of NATO's Arctic members: Canada and Norway. Their attitudes exist on a spectrum spanning from Canada's prioritization of sovereignty to Norway's efforts to promote regional security collaboration (Lackenbauer and Huebert 2015;James and James 2014;Coffey and Kochis 2018).…”

Section: Hegemonic Rivalry In the Arctic: The Formation Of Competing Power Blocsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Canada is NATO's largest Arctic member with extensive territories in the far north and control over the majority of the NWP, which runs through the Canadian Archipelago. Canada is concerned that a larger role from NATO in the Arctic would increase the influence of non-Arctic jwsr.pitt.edu | DOI 10.5195/JWSR.2021.1042 states in the region, possibly putting aspects of Canadian sovereignty in jeopardy (James and James 2014). Even bi-lateral security arrangements in the Arctic with the United States, Canada's closest ally politically and physically, have proved unpopular with the Canadian electorate, especially those in the Far North (Lackenbauer and Huebert 2015).…”

Section: Hegemonic Rivalry In the Arctic: The Formation Of Competing Power Blocsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Evolving Arctic in the World-System

Lavengood

2021

JWSR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Global climate change’s continuing effect on the Arctic has brought about a fundamental shift in the region’s identity as it becomes an ever more active area in the world-system. Economic opportunities such as new shipping routes and a bounty of natural resources that were hitherto ice-locked are becoming accessible as the pace of climate change quickens, garnering increasing attention from actors around the world-system. This article explores the new geopolitical and economic realities of the Arctic through the lens of world-system analysis by examining the region’s budding role in the world-economy and emerging economic opportunities, its unique core-peripheral nature, and its potential to spark a regional hegemonic rivalry between NATO and a Sino-Russian partnership. This article aims introduce the evolving Arctic to world-systems studies and promote further research on the region using the theoretical framework.

show abstract

The Model Arctic Council: Simulated Negotiations as Pedagogy and Embodied Diplomacy

Sarson

Muzik

Ray

et al. 2019

American Review of Canadian Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Canada, the United States and Arctic Sovereignty: Architecture Without Building?

Cited by 6 publications

References 12 publications

International Reactions to the Capitol Attack of January 6th: A Media Frames Analysis

International Reactions to the Capitol Attack of January 6th: A Media Frames Analysis

The Evolving Arctic in the World-System

The Model Arctic Council: Simulated Negotiations as Pedagogy and Embodied Diplomacy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About