2010
DOI: 10.1108/10595421011065307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canada's global and business competitiveness: competition policy reform in a changing world

Abstract: PurposeExploration of the policy reforms necessary to strengthen Canada's competitiveness among world trading economies. The paper aims to compare Canada's competitiveness with two economic partners, the USA and the UK, and two emerging economies, China and India.Design/methodology/approachData from the annual Global Competitiveness Reports (GCRs) were used to compare Canada with the other countries.FindingsCanada requires a national strategy to create a generation of Canadian innovators, entrepreneurs and exe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The country’s economic status was assessed by measures like prosperity, productivity, internationalization, innovation and productivity growth. Kiggundu and Uruthirapathy (2010) compared Canada’s competitiveness with its two, strong traditional economic partners, the US and the UK, and two emerging nations, India and China. The comparison was based on three broad factors consisting of nine pillars of growth competitiveness index (later became GCI), on business competitiveness and on domestic competition and cluster development for the years 1998–2006.…”
Section: Approaches To Competitivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The country’s economic status was assessed by measures like prosperity, productivity, internationalization, innovation and productivity growth. Kiggundu and Uruthirapathy (2010) compared Canada’s competitiveness with its two, strong traditional economic partners, the US and the UK, and two emerging nations, India and China. The comparison was based on three broad factors consisting of nine pillars of growth competitiveness index (later became GCI), on business competitiveness and on domestic competition and cluster development for the years 1998–2006.…”
Section: Approaches To Competitivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As competition lies at the heart of competitiveness, most of the research efforts have been on analyzing competitiveness with respect to competition. Assessment of competitiveness at national level (Adams et al, 2004; Amin and Hagen, 1998; Kiggundu and Uruthirapathy, 2010; Liu and Hsu, 2009; Porter and Ketels, 2003; Waheeduzzaman, 2011), at industry level (Alon et al, 2010; Momaya, 1998, 2008; Sardy and Fetscherin, 2009; Shafaei and Shahriari, 2010; Sun et al, 2010) and at firm level has been made with focus on competition. With the changing dynamics of global competition, competitive advantage can be short lived.…”
Section: Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…factor conditions, demand conditions, firm strategy, structure and rivalry, related and supporting industries) as compared to China. Kiggundu & Uruthirapathy (2010) linked the competitiveness of Canada with its two traditional economic partners, the UK and the US, and two emerging states, India and China. The evaluation was made based on three extensive factors comprising nine pillars of competitiveness index growth (later became GCI), on domestic competition, business competitiveness and on cluster development in the years 1998 to 2006.…”
Section: Fig 1 -Porter's Diamond Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%