Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2021
DOI: 10.1145/3411764.3445545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can You Hear My Heartbeat?: Hearing an Expressive Biosignal Elicits Empathy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also consider potential lines of future research which stem from our design discussions and the novel contexts explored in our work. Embodied social cognition through technology can explore flexible multisensory methods (e.g., combinations or subsets of haptic [43], sonic [93], olfactory [73], and visual [46] technologies) if future research sheds more light on how specific perceptual cues from virtual embodiment relate to social cognition [10,35,50]. We saw hints of this from REPT participants referring to specifically head and hand movements as triggering cues in our findings.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…We also consider potential lines of future research which stem from our design discussions and the novel contexts explored in our work. Embodied social cognition through technology can explore flexible multisensory methods (e.g., combinations or subsets of haptic [43], sonic [93], olfactory [73], and visual [46] technologies) if future research sheds more light on how specific perceptual cues from virtual embodiment relate to social cognition [10,35,50]. We saw hints of this from REPT participants referring to specifically head and hand movements as triggering cues in our findings.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The advantage of face images in empathy revealed in our current study was in line with the study conducted by Salminen et al 17 , that investigated how image styles affected user perceptions of personas and found higher perception of empathy for a persona with real face images as compared to no pictures. This advantage may be attributed to the eyes region in the face image, considering that cognitive empathy refers to understand others' emotion statement involving cognitive process 30 and highly correlates to so called perspective taking 33 , which refers to the ability to consciously put oneself into the mind of another person to understand what she/he is thinking or feeling and is usually measured by the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task (RMET) 34,35 . The attribution of the eyes region also explained why the advantage of cartoon face images disappeared in the online experiment, in where the size of the cartoon face profile photo used as stimuli was smaller, resulting a smaller corresponding eye region and lower cognitive empathy rating.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, visual information of body postures is often lost due to the limited field of view of the camera (Khamis et al, 2018;Tag et al, 2022a;Sarsenbayeva et al, 2020). However, prior works have shown that the accessibility of biosignal data, e.g., heartbeat information, potentially increases empathy levels of users who are deaf or hard of hearing, thus offering solutions to this problem (Winters et al, 2021).…”
Section: Accessibility Research Roadmapmentioning
confidence: 99%