Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2017
DOI: 10.1002/jgf2.16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can we truly rely on the urinary antigen test for the diagnosis? Legionella case report

Abstract: It is critical to diagnose and treat Legionella pneumonia (LP) immediately after infection because of the associated high mortality. The urine antigen test (UAT) is often used for the diagnosis of LP; however, it cannot detect the serogroups of all Legionella species. A detained medical history and several clinical findings such as liver enzyme elevation and hyponatremia are useful in diagnosis. Some specific types of Legionella are found in compost. Herein, we report a case of LP in which the patient's medica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Part of the explanation for this lies in the detection method used and the designation of confirmed cases. A urinary antigen test is often used to diagnose legionellosis, but it is not sensitive enough [ 35 ]. Although not time-consuming and easily implemented, this test only detects Legionella pneumophila serotype 1 ( Lp1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part of the explanation for this lies in the detection method used and the designation of confirmed cases. A urinary antigen test is often used to diagnose legionellosis, but it is not sensitive enough [ 35 ]. Although not time-consuming and easily implemented, this test only detects Legionella pneumophila serotype 1 ( Lp1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%