2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2010.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can unbiased be tighter? Assessment of methods to reduce the bias-variance trade-off in WTP estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If Bivariate model coefficients are not significantly different, the underlying value distributions can be considered as equivalent, i.e. no significant response bias affects the validity of the estimates [81]. The Wald test indicated that we can jointly estimate first and second bid.…”
Section: The Econometric Analysis Reveals Several Interesting Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If Bivariate model coefficients are not significantly different, the underlying value distributions can be considered as equivalent, i.e. no significant response bias affects the validity of the estimates [81]. The Wald test indicated that we can jointly estimate first and second bid.…”
Section: The Econometric Analysis Reveals Several Interesting Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We follow [82] where the author proposed a Stata estimator to estimate the doublebounded dichotomous choice model for contingent valuation proposed in [83] using the maximum likelihood (under the assumption of normality). As reported in [82], Haab and McConnell (2002) [84] refer to this model as the Interval Data Model.…”
Section: The Econometric Analysis Reveals Several Interesting Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%