2012
DOI: 10.17979/ejge.2012.1.2.4282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can the modernisation of a public employment service be an effective labour market intervention? The Hungarian experience, 2004-2008

Abstract: The Public Employment Service often delivers much of the employment policy including active labour market programmes in many member states in the EU, yet we know little about its effectiveness in general. This paper provides a quantitative assessment of the potential impact of the modernisation programme of the Hungarian Public Employment service between 2004 and 2008. Using data at the level of local offices, I calculate programme effects using a difference-in-difference estimator. Results show that the progr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cumulative earnings were higher by about 61% of the minimum wage for job trial participants during the 6 months after completing the programme 17 . There may be an upward bias in these estimates, considering that the public works programme might have a negative impact on employment outcomes on the primary labour market (see Caliendo & Schmidl, 2016 for international evidence and Cseres‐Gergely & Molnár, 2015, Köllő & Scharle, 2012 specifically for Hungary. )…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cumulative earnings were higher by about 61% of the minimum wage for job trial participants during the 6 months after completing the programme 17 . There may be an upward bias in these estimates, considering that the public works programme might have a negative impact on employment outcomes on the primary labour market (see Caliendo & Schmidl, 2016 for international evidence and Cseres‐Gergely & Molnár, 2015, Köllő & Scharle, 2012 specifically for Hungary. )…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most participants work full time, which leaves little time for job search, increasing the risk of lock-in. The existing evaluations (though not fully eliminating endogeneity and selection bias) indeed show that the programme does not improve the likelihood of reemployment and has failed to reduce long-term unemployment at the settlement level (see for exampleKöll} o & Scharle, 2012, Cseres-Gergely & Molnár, 2015.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) The extension of public work schemes in 2009 and their massive expansion from 2012 (after a sudden decline in 2011; Cseres-Gergely and Molnár 2014Molnár , 2015 further decreased the risk-taking propensity of the unemployed.…”
Section: The Design and Launch Of The Kiútprogrammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the EU Employment Summit's proposal (2009), three main policies were recommended: to save existing jobs and create new ones; to provide training and improve the match between labor market demand and supply; to improve employment odds (Cseres-Gergely & Scharle, 2009). Under these circumstances more and more action plans have come into force to require active governmental measures both in high-and medium-income countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%