Can the implementation of the Europe 2020 Strategy goals be efficient? The challenge for achieving social equality in the European Union

Abstract

Research background: Economic crisis hit all the European Union Member States hard, with the impact of crisis varying considerably. The low growth performance in the EU has increased concerns regarding an increasing wage dispersion, income inequality at large, and social exclusion in line with poverty. Inequality should be seen as a cornerstone of both sustainable and inclusive growth under the Europe 2020 Strategy. Social inequality in the EU is a real problem, which hampers sustainable economic growth.
 Purpose of the article: The purpose of this study is to introduce evaluation of social development convergence and divergence trends between the EU Member States in the context of the Europe 2020 Strategy. The study gives an outline of the issues of the labour market and income disparities and poverty. Policymakers must be clear about what social objectives they are aiming to achieve, therefore special attention is paid to headline national goals of the Europe 2020 Strategy.
 Methods: The main task of this study is to assess social dimension and inequalities problems in the EU27 by applying Data Envelopment Analysis method, resp. time-series dynamic efficiency analysis in the form of output-oriented Malmquist Productivity Index. This study contains changes of key social equality indicators related to the Europe 2020 Strategy and compares objectives and general outlines of period 2010-2015, as well as the impact on national economics and living conditions.
 Findings & value added: Results contain elements of typology premises of the EU28 and point to a large diversity in inequality patterns, as the Author observes both increases and decreases in inequality at the EU level. Recent changes in social inequality have been associated with the business cycle, particularly with the accessibility of the labour market and, of course, with income inequality. Additionally, the development challenges are discussed for improvement of the socioeconomic well-being of the EU and to avoid social disparities.

A slack-based measure of agricultural efficiency in the European Union countries

“…Between them, the most important were the Stochastic Frontier Approach (SFA), and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). The difference between mentioned methods is that DEA belongs to non-parametric methods (Staníčková, 2017;Cyrek, 2017), while the SFA is a parametric method. The objective of this study is to examine the relative technical efficiency of the agriculture in the EU countries using DEA.…”

Is the Regional Divergence a Price for the International Convergence? The Case of the Visegrad Group

“…7th Cohesion Forum that was held on 26-27 June 2017 in Brussels, European Commission 2017a;2017d;2017e) and scientific fields (Baddeley, 2006;Anagnostou, Kalliora, Kollias, 2015;Balcerzak, Rogalska, 2016;Próchniak, Witkowski, 2016;Cosci, Mirra, 2017;Furkova, Chocholata, 2017;Horridge, Rokicki, 2017;Scheurer, Haase, 2017;Pietrzak, Balcerzak, 2017;Stanickova, 2017). This should not be surprising as Cohesion Policy is a binder that holds Europe together.…”

Efficiency of banks in Slovakia: Measuring by DEA models

“…DEA models fully embody the definition of efficiency. Decision Making Unit is to be rated as fully efficient on the basis of available evidence if and only if the performances of other Decision Making Units (DMUs) does not show that some of its inputs or outputs can be improved without worsening some of its other inputs or outputs (Bogetoft & Otto, 2011;Cyrek, 2017;Stanickova, 2017). The main uses have been in evaluations of "management" and "program" efficiencies of DMUs of a not-for-profit variety such as schools, hospitals, etc (Banker et al, 1984).…”