Can the endurance training change the pacing strategy during 10 km running performance?

Manoel, Francisco de Assis; Figueiredo, Diogo Hilgemberg; Machado, Fabiana Andrade

doi:10.1080/24748668.2018.1454744

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To complete a 10 km performance, participants adopted the "U" strategy [ 41 ]. This strategy is commonly used by moderate and high-performance runners [ 26 , 42 ]. After assessing the contribution of some physiological and muscular variables to the rhythm strategy adopted during the 10 km running performance, Bertuzzi et al [ 25 ] concluded that V peak , V̇O 2max and 1 maximum repetition are the variables that best explain the performance in the intermediate phase (0.4–9.6 km) and only V peak in the final phase (9.6–10 km), reaffirming its high performance prediction capacity for this type of test.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Novel track field test to determine Vpeak, relationship with treadmill test and 10-km running performance in trained endurance runners

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives The aim of this study was to determine the peak running velocity on the track field (Vpeak_TF) based on the laboratory treadmill test (Vpeak_T), and relate the Vpeak values as well as their correlation with the 10-km running performance in trained endurance runners. Method Twenty male trained endurance runners (age: 29.5 ± 5.3 years; V̇O2max: 67.5±17.6 ml · kg-1·min-1) performed three maximum incremental tests to determine the Vpeak: one for Vpeak_T determination and two to obtain Vpeak_TF on the official track field (400 m), and a 10-km running performance. During the incremental tests, maximum heart rate (HRmax), maximal rating of perceived exertion (RPEmax), and peak lactate concentration (LApeak) were determined. Results The results showed significant difference between the Vpeak_TF and Vpeak_T (18.1 ± 1.2 vs. 19.2 ± 1.5 km·h-1, respectively), as well as the total time of the tests, the distance traveled and the RPEmax determined during the tests. A high correlation was observed between the Vpeak values (r = 0.94), and between Vpeak_TF and Vpeak_T with 10-km running performance (r = -0.95 vs. r = -0.89, respectively). Conclusions The good agreement and association with Vpeak_T and high correlation with 10-km running performance demonstrate that the novel track field test is efficient for Vpeak_TF determination.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%