2010
DOI: 10.1080/17470210903156586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can the dual-route cascaded computational model of reading offer a valid account of the masked onset priming effect?

Abstract: The masked onset priming effect (MOPE) refers to the empirical finding that target naming is faster when the target (SIB) is preceded by a briefly presented masked prime that starts with the same letter/phoneme (suf) than when it does not (mof; Kinoshita, 2000, Experiment 1). The dual-route cascaded (DRC) computational model of reading (Coltheart, Rastle, Perry, Langdon, & Ziegler, 2001) has offered an explanation for how the MOPE might occur in humans. However, there has been some empirical discrepancy regard… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A term frequently found in the psycholinguistic literature is the “Masked Onset Priming Effect” or MOPE (e.g., Schiller, 2008 ; Mousikou et al, 2010 ) which refers to the finding in Indo-European languages (such as English, Dutch) that faster speech onset latencies occur when reading aloud target words that are preceded by a prime sharing its onset with the target. However, it might be more reasonable to use the term “Masked Initial Segment Priming Effect” or MISPE instead as it has been shown that the effect may depend on the language at hand (e.g., the onset in Dutch/English, the mora in Japanese and the syllable in Chinese) as well as an individual’s proficiency level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A term frequently found in the psycholinguistic literature is the “Masked Onset Priming Effect” or MOPE (e.g., Schiller, 2008 ; Mousikou et al, 2010 ) which refers to the finding in Indo-European languages (such as English, Dutch) that faster speech onset latencies occur when reading aloud target words that are preceded by a prime sharing its onset with the target. However, it might be more reasonable to use the term “Masked Initial Segment Priming Effect” or MISPE instead as it has been shown that the effect may depend on the language at hand (e.g., the onset in Dutch/English, the mora in Japanese and the syllable in Chinese) as well as an individual’s proficiency level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with the pattern that has been observed with monolingual speakers of English: an additional overlap in the vowel segment beyond the consonantal onset overlap leads to only a small increment in priming. For example, Kinoshita (2000) used 3-letter CVC non-word targets and reported that the onset priming effect (e.g., suf-SIB vs. muf-SIB) was substantial but an extra vowel overlap (sif-SIB) added only a statistically non-significant 3 ms increment; similarly, Mousikou et al (2010) reported a small 4 ms (though statistically significant) increment.…”
Section: Experiments 2: High-proficient Japanese–english Bilingualsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the double dissociations that have been reported for visual imagery on the one hand and visual perception on the other hand at higher order levels of the visual processing stream like color and object categories (e.g., faces), in verbal material as well as in other modalities (Bartolomeo et al, 1998;Dulin et al, 2011;Guaita et al, 2009;Metcalf, Langdon, & Coltheart, 2010) we hypothesize intact imagery activation in higher order cortical regions (Mousikou, Coltheart, Finkbeiner, & Saunders, 2010). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Firstly, from a purely logical point of view, it is reasonable to suppose that phonological ability influences the process of learning alphabetic writing systems, given that such systems represent speech sounds. Secondly, it is well established that phonological representations are active during the reading process (see Mousikou, Coltheart, Finkbeiner, & Saunders, 2010). It is therefore logical to consider the possibility that the process of learning to read is influenced by the nature of the phonological representations possessed by the learner.…”
Section: The Relationship Between Phonological Awareness and Reading mentioning
confidence: 99%