2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine function concurrently as modulatory opponents in operant and pavlovian occasion setting paradigms in rats?

Abstract: Nicotine promotes interoceptive changes in the nervous system. Such interoceptive stimuli play important roles in modulating addictive behavior. Operant and Pavlovian stimulus control modulate responsiveness to environmental stimuli related to drug-seeking and self- administration. Nicotine functions as a discriminative stimulus in modulating operant behavior as well as Pavlovian feature stimuli in modulating the conditional responding (CR) to exteroceptive CSUS contingencies. Elucidation of the interaction of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Characteristics of maintained drug self-administration indicate that drug or drug-associated stimuli encountered by an animal in a drug-free state will initiate drug intake, but when the drug level reaches above a satiety threshold, i.e., the minimal drug level at which self-administration is maintained, animals temporarily suspend drug seeking [ 15 , 280 ]. Consistent with this position, the presence or absence of a drug in the biological system has been demonstrated to serve discriminative functions that signal the availability of certain reinforcers, e.g., food and water [ 285 288 ]. Not only can drugs serve as discriminative stimuli in general but also the discriminative control of the training drug can also be generalized to drugs with comparable mechanisms of action [ 289 292 ].…”
Section: Drug Regulationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Characteristics of maintained drug self-administration indicate that drug or drug-associated stimuli encountered by an animal in a drug-free state will initiate drug intake, but when the drug level reaches above a satiety threshold, i.e., the minimal drug level at which self-administration is maintained, animals temporarily suspend drug seeking [ 15 , 280 ]. Consistent with this position, the presence or absence of a drug in the biological system has been demonstrated to serve discriminative functions that signal the availability of certain reinforcers, e.g., food and water [ 285 288 ]. Not only can drugs serve as discriminative stimuli in general but also the discriminative control of the training drug can also be generalized to drugs with comparable mechanisms of action [ 289 292 ].…”
Section: Drug Regulationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Historically, the operant drug discrimination paradigm with rodents has proven to be valuable preclinically for evaluating the interoceptive stimulus effects of psychoactive drugs of use and abuse (Overton, 1982), including nicotine (Shoaib & Perkins, 2020); it has also been used theoretically to investigate associative phenomena embedded within the interoceptive stimulus functions of nicotine (e.g., Troisi & Michaud, 2019). Interestingly, there is a paucity of animal research examining sex differences in the stimulus functions of nicotine and other drugs (Bevins & Charntikov, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%