2017
DOI: 10.1177/1753193417741237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can surgical guidelines minimize complications after Maïa® trapeziometacarpal joint arthroplasty with unconstrained cups?

Abstract: IV.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…26 Dislocation and loosening of the cup remain the major problems with TMC prosthesis. 27 Dislocation rate is low in our series compared to other series such as ARPE prosthesis in the study by Jacoulet 28 (8%), Rubis II by Maes et al 29 (5%) and Maia prosthesis by Bricout and Rezzouk 24 (4.5%). A 2% to 5% dislocation rate was reported in a multicenter study of the Ivory prosthesis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…26 Dislocation and loosening of the cup remain the major problems with TMC prosthesis. 27 Dislocation rate is low in our series compared to other series such as ARPE prosthesis in the study by Jacoulet 28 (8%), Rubis II by Maes et al 29 (5%) and Maia prosthesis by Bricout and Rezzouk 24 (4.5%). A 2% to 5% dislocation rate was reported in a multicenter study of the Ivory prosthesis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…The only subjective data almost always recorded was pain. In the 46 total implant arthroplasty articles (excluding silastic replacements) published between 2000 and 2019 (Apard and Saint-Cast, 2007; Badia and Sambandam, 2006; Brikout and Rezzouk, 2016; Brutus and Kinnen, 2004; Caekebeke and Duerinckx, 2018; Cebrian-Gomez et al., 2019; Chug et al., 2014; Cootjans et al., 2017; Craik et al., 2017; De Smet et al., 2004; Dehl et al., 2017; Dreant and Poumellec, 2019; Erne et al., 2018; Goubau et al., 2013; Guardia et al., 2010; Hansen and Vainorius, 2008; Hernández-Cortés et al., 2012; Isselin, 2001; Jacoulet, 2005; Jager et al., 2013; Johnston et al., 2012; Kaszap and Daecke, 2012; Klahn et al., 2012; Kollig et al., 2017; Krukhaug et al., 2014; Lemoine et al., 2009; Maes et al., 2010; Martin-Ferrero, 2014; Masmejean et al., 2003; Moutet et al., 2001; Pendse et al., 2009; Pérez-Ubeda et al. 2003; Regnard, 2006; Robles-Molina et al., 2017; Schuhl, 2001; Semere et al., 2015; Seng and Chantelot, 2013; Spaans et al., 2016; ten Brinke et al., 2016; Thillerman et al., 2016; Toffoli and Teissier, 2017; Ulrich-Vinther et al., 2008; Vander Eecken et al., 2012; van Rijn and Gosens, 2010; Vissers et al., 2019; Zollinger et al., 2008) functional scores were used infrequently (Table 1).…”
Section: Functional Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Избыточное напряжение, создаваемое этой конструкцией, по мнению авторов, объясняет короткий срок службы протезов [62]. однако некоторые авторы указывают на возможность более длительного функционирования протезов при условии точной ориентации чашки, совпадающей с наклоном суставной поверхности кости-трапеции -волярно под углом 45° [63]. j. Knak и T. Hansen, анализируя осложнения, также отметили ориентацию чашки в коститрапеции как критический фактор, влияющий на результат протезирования [61].…”
Section: реконструкция седловидного сустава при остеоартрозе Iii-iv сunclassified