“…[7,8] Although the obtained images resemble some textbook representations of occupied orbitals,s everal authors commented on these conclusions by stressing that, according to fundamental quantum mechanics,o rbitals are not observable. [9][10][11][12] Dauth et al [13] have explained that the correct interpretation of ARPES and EMS is that they provide Dyson orbitals,r ather than initial-state molecular orbitals,a nd that therefore these experiments have often been misinterpreted. This conclusion undermines claims that these experiments reflect "what actually electrons do in amolecule prior to their knock-out" [7] and therefore that hybrid molecular orbitals (HMOs) or localized molecular orbitals (LMOs) do not represent ap hysically valid orbital picture [7,8] In order to try to prevent these misinterpretations from gaining af oothold, we present some pedagogical background (see also previous articles along these lines [14,15] )t hat we hope will help clarify orbital concepts.T wo key points we emphasize are:1 )One cannot describe an N-electron wave function exactly in terms of N spin-orbitals,e ach containing one electron, and 2) a Dyson orbital is not an orbital of the molecule studied by photoelectron spectroscopy,and thus it is not an orbital in the usually understood sense,but rather it involves ageneralized use of the word "orbital" as an amplitude representation of the difference in the electron distribution of am olecule before and after ionization.…”