2012
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/746/2/162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Minor Merging Account for the Size Growth of Quiescent Galaxies? New Results From the Candels Survey

Abstract: The presence of extremely compact galaxies at z ∼ 2 and their subsequent growth in physical size has been the cause of much puzzlement. We revisit the question using deep infrared Wide Field Camera 3 data to probe the rest-frame optical structure of 935 galaxies selected with 0.4 < z < 2.5 and stellar masses M * > 10 10.7 M in the UKIRT Ultra Deep Survey and GOODS-South fields of the CANDELS survey. At each redshift, the most compact sources are those with little or no star formation, and the mean size of thes… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

101
608
4
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 454 publications
(723 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
101
608
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is important because the evolution of galaxy properties with redshift can cause systematic differences in their values, which may align with quenching and have no causal connection. For instance, the size of a galaxy of a given mass evolves with redshift as (1 + z) −a , where a ∼ 1 (e.g., Newman et al 2012). This results in galaxies which are quenched earlier in the history of the Universe having smaller sizes for their masses, and hence higher central mass concentrations and presumably central velocity dispersions.…”
Section: Alternative Explanations To Agn Feedback and Green Valley Fracmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is important because the evolution of galaxy properties with redshift can cause systematic differences in their values, which may align with quenching and have no causal connection. For instance, the size of a galaxy of a given mass evolves with redshift as (1 + z) −a , where a ∼ 1 (e.g., Newman et al 2012). This results in galaxies which are quenched earlier in the history of the Universe having smaller sizes for their masses, and hence higher central mass concentrations and presumably central velocity dispersions.…”
Section: Alternative Explanations To Agn Feedback and Green Valley Fracmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and the factor 0.65 is the fraction of companions of massive galaxies that are already early-type/red galaxies (López-Sanjuan et al 2012;Newman et al 2012). As previously, we define the major merger efficiency as MM ≡ (z, M , M ,lim , μ max = 1, μ min = 1/4) and the minor merger efficiency as mm ≡ (z, M , M ,lim , μ max = 1/4, μ min = 1/10).…”
Section: Testing the Major Merger Origin Of Massive Early-type Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When Newman et al (2012) ask whether the size growth of quiescent galaxies could be due to mergers, they do not ask whether a predicted frequency of merging could account for the observed growth. They take orthodox cosmology for granted and ask whether the observed growth could be accounted for by mergers at all.…”
Section: Angular Sizementioning
confidence: 99%