2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.05.032
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can microorganisms develop resistance against light based anti-infective agents?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discrepancies in the results that were obtained by various research groups raise the question of the need for standardized protocols for the testing of bacterial resistance to light-based therapies, which was also highlighted in the latest review by Marasini et al (2021). The authors suggested that in future research, it is important to assess reproducibility during assessment of the potential development of tolerance or resistance, and we agree with this statement [ 57 ]. The literature shows that Gram-negative bacteria, including E. coli , have repeatedly acquired adaptations to many chemical factors, such as acids [ 58 , 59 ], organic solvents [ 33 , 34 ], heavy metals [ 60 , 61 ], and physical factors such as ionizing [ 37 ] or UV radiation [ 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The discrepancies in the results that were obtained by various research groups raise the question of the need for standardized protocols for the testing of bacterial resistance to light-based therapies, which was also highlighted in the latest review by Marasini et al (2021). The authors suggested that in future research, it is important to assess reproducibility during assessment of the potential development of tolerance or resistance, and we agree with this statement [ 57 ]. The literature shows that Gram-negative bacteria, including E. coli , have repeatedly acquired adaptations to many chemical factors, such as acids [ 58 , 59 ], organic solvents [ 33 , 34 ], heavy metals [ 60 , 61 ], and physical factors such as ionizing [ 37 ] or UV radiation [ 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Given the multi-targeted nature of aPDT, the possibility for microorganisms to develop resistance is supposed to be very limited [36]. However, they may be able to respond to aPDT in different ways.…”
Section: Biological Effects Of Apdt: Potential Targets and Related Me...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[42] Last but not least, the afterglow emission is used as an internal light source to persistently excite photosensitizers and generate ROS, which could overcome the short half-life and durability of traditional PDT. [15] ZGC NDs could be activated by LED (300-600 nm), making mPL@Pc-Cy NPs no longer limited by the afterglow time. The persistent and repeatable PDT avoids excessively high ROS levels in a short time period, which could alleviate oxidative stress and minimize side effects.…”
Section: In Vivo Treatment Safety Of Mpl@pc-cy/lightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 14 ] Light‐based antibacterial approaches possess the potential to kill a wide range of bacteria with high spatial and temporal precision, irrespective of bacterial drug resistance status. [ 15 ] Photothermal therapy (PTT) offers thermal inactivation of bacteria; however, the elevated temperature (over 50 °C) may damage the surrounding healthy tissues and even produce heat shock proteins to generate resistance to PTT. [ 16 ] Photodynamic therapy (PDT) generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) to destruct bacterial membrane, protein, and DNA for non‐specific sterilization while causing negligible drug resistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%