Over the past 50 years conservation genetics has developed a substantive
toolbox to inform species management. One of the most long-standing
tools available to manage genetics - the pedigree - has been widely used
to characterize diversity and maximize evolutionary potential in
threatened populations. Now, with the ability to use high throughput
sequencing (HTS) to estimate relatedness, inbreeding, and genome-wide
functional diversity, some have asked whether it is warranted for
conservation biologists to continue collecting and collating pedigrees
for species management. In this perspective, we argue that pedigrees
remain a relevant tool, and when combined with genomic data, create an
invaluable resource for conservation genomic management. Genomic data
can address pedigree pitfalls (e.g., founder relatedness, missing data,
uncertainty), and in return robust pedigrees allow for more nuanced
research design, including well-informed sampling strategies and
quantitative analyses (e.g., heritability, linkage) to better inform
genomic inquiry. We further contend that building and maintaining
pedigrees provides an opportunity to strengthen trusted relationships
among conservation researchers, practitioners, Indigenous Peoples, and
local communities.