Can linear transportation infrastructure verges constitute a habitat and/or a corridor for vertebrates in temperate ecosystems? A systematic review

Abstract

Background: Linear transportation infrastructures (roads, railways, oil and gas pipelines, powerlines and waterways) generate well documented fragmenting effects on species habitats. However, the potential of verges of linear transportation infrastructures (road and railway embankments, strips of grass under power lines or above buried pipelines, or waterway banks) as habitat or corridor for biodiversity, remains controversial. In a context of constant loss of natural habitats, the opportunities of anthropogenic areas for compensating the loss of biodiversity they generated have to be considered. This paper is the first synthesis of evidence addressing this topic for vertebrates (mammals, birds, amphibians and reptiles) in temperate ecosystems. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature survey using two online publication databases, three search engines, specialist websites, and by sending a call for literature to subject experts. We successively screened the articles for relevance on titles, abstracts and full texts using criteria detailed in an a priori protocol. We then used six specific questions to categorize the retained studies and to critically appraise them. These questions encompassed the potential of verges as habitats and corridors for vertebrates, and the effects of landscape and management on these potentialities. We critically appraised all studies to assess their risk of bias and created a database of the studies with low and medium risk of bias. We synthesized results for each specific question in narrative syntheses. Finally, studies that met meta-analysis requirements were used for quantitative syntheses. Results: Our initial searches identified 83,565 documents. After critical appraisal, we retained 119 documents that reported 128 studies. Most studies were conducted in Europe (49%) and in the United States of America (22%), and were about mammals (61%) and birds (20%). Results from the narrative synthesis and meta-analyses converged and revealed that the potential of linear transportation infrastructures verges to constitute a habitat for vertebrate species varies according to the infrastructure and the biological group considered. Especially, highway verges may be a refuge for small mammals but seems detrimental to birds. The potential also varied depending on the landscape considered, with urbanisation being related to lower biodiversity hosted by verges. We found a wide variety of verge

Olive Trees By-Products as Sources of Bioactive and Other Industrially Useful Compounds: A Systematic Review

“…The assessment of bias risk, based on a checklist adapted from the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [ 17 ] and Collaboration for Environmental Evidence (CEE) Guidelines and Standards for Evidence Synthesis in Environmental Management, in conformance to ROSES reporting standards [ 18 , 19 ] isreported in the bar graph of Figure 4 . The majority of included articles fall into the low-risk of bias category, enhancing the overall quality of the manuscript.…”

“…The methodological quality and the risk of bias assessment were carried out independently by the authors, using a checklist adapted from Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , appropriately adjusted for animal intervention study (SYRCLE’s) [ 17 , 126 ] and clinical trials [ 127 ]. For the environmental study, the quality assessment was based on Collaboration for Environmental Evidence (CEE) Guidelines and Standards for Evidence Synthesis in Environmental Management, in conformance to ROSES reporting standards [ 18 , 19 ]. The appraisal of the methodological quality of the selected studies was based on the presence or absence of information regarding the main objectives and findings, randomization of the treatment allocation, sampling, blinded drug administration, blinded outcome assessment and outcome measurements, method description, number of replicates, as reported in Table 5 , Table 6 and Table 7 .…”

“… The assessment of bias risk is based on a checklist adapted from the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [ 17 ] and Collaboration for Environmental Evidence (CEE) Guidelines and Standards for Evidence Synthesis in Environmental Management, in conformance to ROSES reporting standards [ 18 , 19 ]. The studies regarding the different biological activities and the industrial uses have been classified into high (red), medium (orange), and low (blue) risks of bias.…”

Ecological Solutions for Linear Infrastructure Networks: The key to green infrastructure development

“…The approach towards linear infrastructure planning is also transforming. Linear infrastructure-related habitats are increasingly valued for the biodiversity conservation opportunity they provide and have become a key contributor to Green Infrastructure development (Dániel-Ferreira et al 2020;Ouédraogo et al 2020). There is also a growing awareness of the need for coexistence between infrastructure and biodiversity, and citizens participate in this process (Périquet et al 2018;Waetjen and Shilling 2018).…”

The Impact of Roads on the Redistribution of Plants and Associated Arthropods in a Hyper-Arid Ecosystem

“…The ecological impacts of vehicular roads have been extensively studied, mostly in temperate environments, and may include habitat loss, habitat fragmentation, habitat degradation, barrier effects, light, noise and chemical pollution, and direct mortality due to road kills or electrocution from road-related infrastructure (e.g., Forman et al 2003 , Coffin 2007 , Tamayo-Muñoz et al 2015 , Ouédraogo et al 2020 ). In addition, roads are known as a common factor in the disruption of the natural spatial distribution of resources, particularly water ( King and Tennyson 1984 , Lamont et al 1994 , Donaldson and Bennett 2004 , Duniway and Herrick 2011 ).…”