“…For example, studies had used GST to explain violence, general delinquency, nonviolent crimes (e.g., shoplifting), drug use, and even white-collar crime, and had used a variety of different samples, including criminal populations, juveniles, college students, and adults (Agnew & White, 1992;Aseltine, Gore, & Gordon, 2000;Baron & Hartnagel, 2002;Brezina, 1996;Broidy, 2001;Capowich, Mazerolle, & Piquero, 2001;Langton & Piquero, 2007;Mazerolle, Burton, Cullen, Evans, & Payne, 2000;Mazerolle & Piquero, 1997, 1998Paternoster & Mazerolle, 1994;Piquero & Sealock, 2000). Extant research had also helped to further elaborate and clarify the theory by examining the proposed processes (e.g., mediation and conditioning) of the theory and by delineating differences in types of strain (e.g., subjective versus objective), including the various impacts they had on predicting crime and delinquency.…”