2008
DOI: 10.1002/for.1041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can forecasting performance be improved by considering the steady state? An application to Swedish inflation and interest rate

Abstract: This paper investigates whether the forecasting performance of Bayesian autoregressive and vector autoregressive models can be improved by incorporating prior beliefs on the steady state of the time series in the system. Traditional methodology is compared to the new framework-in which a mean-adjusted form of the models is employed-by estimating the models on Swedish inflation and interest rate data from 1980 to 2004. Results show that the out-of-sample forecasting ability of the models is practically unchange… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(12 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The BVARs with most variables in gap form and steady state priors (for simplicity, much of the discussion below simply refers to these models as BVARs with steady state priors) generally yield lower RMSEs than conventional BVARs. This finding is in line with evidence in Clark andMcCracken (2008, 2010) on the advantage of detrending and evidence in Adolfson, et al (2007), Beechey and Osterholm (2008), Osterholm (2008), andWright (2010) on the advantage of steady state priors. The advantage is most striking for 2-year ahead forecasts of inflation.…”
Section: Point Forecastssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The BVARs with most variables in gap form and steady state priors (for simplicity, much of the discussion below simply refers to these models as BVARs with steady state priors) generally yield lower RMSEs than conventional BVARs. This finding is in line with evidence in Clark andMcCracken (2008, 2010) on the advantage of detrending and evidence in Adolfson, et al (2007), Beechey and Osterholm (2008), Osterholm (2008), andWright (2010) on the advantage of steady state priors. The advantage is most striking for 2-year ahead forecasts of inflation.…”
Section: Point Forecastssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Villani (2009) develops a Bayesian estimator of a (constant variance) VAR with an informative prior on the steady state. Applications of the estimator in studies such as Adolfson, et al (2007), Beechey and Osterholm (2008), Osterholm (2008), and Wright (2010) have shown that the use of a prior on the steady state often improves the accuracy of point forecasts. In a methodological sense, this paper extends the estimator of Villani (2009) to include stochastic volatility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This methodology has been shown to improve forecasts relative to traditional BVARs – see, for example, Adolfson et al. (2007) and Österholm (2008)– and will be used as a forecasting tool in this paper.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“… Studies such as Clark (), Osterholm () and Wright () have shown that the performance of models with variables transformed for stationarity can be improved significantly with the use of the steady‐state prior developed in Villani (2009). As Villani's estimation approach involves Gibbs sampling, it is significantly more computationally demanding than a model specified to permit a Normal‐inverted Wishart prior and posterior.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%