2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.hitech.2006.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can experts really assess future technology success? A neural network and Bayesian analysis of early stage technology proposals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These funding entities oftentimes use a sequential process of decision making. The process typically begins with a fairly quick screening, or “down-select” process, in which a number of written business plans, proposals, or applications are formally reviewed and sorted (e.g., Ajamian & Koen, 2002; Galbraith, De Noble, Ehrlich, & Kline, 2007; Linton, Walsh, & Morabito, 2002; Ozer, 1999; Shepard, Zacharakis, & Baron, 2003). Although this initial screening process provides useful information (Galbraith, De Noble, & Ehrlich, 2009, 2012; Payne & Macarty, 2002), funders often require another screening phase in which a select group of the original applicants are allowed to personally present to a panel of decision makers who then vote on the merits of the proposal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These funding entities oftentimes use a sequential process of decision making. The process typically begins with a fairly quick screening, or “down-select” process, in which a number of written business plans, proposals, or applications are formally reviewed and sorted (e.g., Ajamian & Koen, 2002; Galbraith, De Noble, Ehrlich, & Kline, 2007; Linton, Walsh, & Morabito, 2002; Ozer, 1999; Shepard, Zacharakis, & Baron, 2003). Although this initial screening process provides useful information (Galbraith, De Noble, & Ehrlich, 2009, 2012; Payne & Macarty, 2002), funders often require another screening phase in which a select group of the original applicants are allowed to personally present to a panel of decision makers who then vote on the merits of the proposal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, logistic regression provides a conditional probability which is much more useful for predicting possible future obsolescence than trying to categorize whether a component is currently obsolete (Cohen, Cohen, West., & Aiken, 2003). Recent research demonstrated that logistic regression proves as effective in the context of predicting future technology success as other methods such as expert opinion, neural networks, and Bayesian Data Reduction Algorithm (Galbraith, DeNoble, Ehrlich, & Kline, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A. D. Rahal (2005) tai įvardija kaip technologijų vertinimą ir šį procesą apibrėžia kaip perspektyvų vertinimą, planuojant technologijas licencijuoti ar kitaip komercializuoti. Anot C. S. Galbraith et al (2007), tai būsimos technologijos sėkmės vertinimas -bandymas užfiksuoti svarbius veiksnius, kurie teigiamai koreliuoja su sėkmingomis produkto inovacijomis. Anot J. Cho, J. , komercializavimo galimybių vertinimas -naujų technologinių produktų komercializavimo veiksnių identifikavimas ir prioritetų suteikimas.…”
Section: Technologijų Komercinio Potencialo Vertinimo Reikšmė Mokslinius Tyrimus Ir Eksperimentinę Plėtrą Vykdančioms Institucijomsunclassified