2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10096-008-0597-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Escherichia coli be used as an indicator organism for transmission events in hospitals?

Abstract: Can Escherichia coli be used as an indicator organism for transmission events in hospitals? Perineal and pharyngeal swabs were obtained from patients admitted to a medical or surgical intensive care unit within 24 h of admission and then twice per week. Escherichia coli isolates were typed by random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) typing. Based on the typing results, transmission rates for RAPD and AFLP typing were 8.5 and 6.6 per 100 patient-days. Requ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…New frameworks are therefore needed that bridge biological fields (14,15). Since pathogens have a limited number of transmission modes to infect a new host (e.g., direct, environmental such as waterborne, foodborne, or vector/insect-borne transmission), a framework trying to identify the transmission processes linking one host to different sources of pathogens could help identifying hotspots of pathogen transmission and predicting future microorganism transmission at a local level (16,17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New frameworks are therefore needed that bridge biological fields (14,15). Since pathogens have a limited number of transmission modes to infect a new host (e.g., direct, environmental such as waterborne, foodborne, or vector/insect-borne transmission), a framework trying to identify the transmission processes linking one host to different sources of pathogens could help identifying hotspots of pathogen transmission and predicting future microorganism transmission at a local level (16,17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%