2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2012.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can cool flames support quasi-steady alkane droplet burning?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The numerical predictions show the peak gas temperature during the second stage to be approximately 700 K, consistent with the presence of low temperature chemistry. The numerical predictions (Farouk and Dryer 2013) identify the radiative heat loss as being responsible for initiating the 'cool flame', consistent with the experimental observation (Nayagam et al 2012). The model also predicts the presence of gaseous pure fuel vapor in addition to larger alkenes, ketohydroperoxides and cyclic ethers after 'cool flame' extinction that could condense to form the vapor cloud observed in the experiments.…”
Section: Heptanesupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The numerical predictions show the peak gas temperature during the second stage to be approximately 700 K, consistent with the presence of low temperature chemistry. The numerical predictions (Farouk and Dryer 2013) identify the radiative heat loss as being responsible for initiating the 'cool flame', consistent with the experimental observation (Nayagam et al 2012). The model also predicts the presence of gaseous pure fuel vapor in addition to larger alkenes, ketohydroperoxides and cyclic ethers after 'cool flame' extinction that could condense to form the vapor cloud observed in the experiments.…”
Section: Heptanesupporting
confidence: 68%
“…2). The linear vaporization behavior in this 'cool flame' region occurs as a result of low-temperature chemical reactions that somehow are initiated by the visible hot-flame extinction (Nayagam et al 2012). This behavior is consistent with earlier results on combustion of large heptane/hexadecane droplets in 1-atm air that initially contained small amounts (as small as about 5.8% by mass) of hexadecane (Shaw et al 2001).…”
Section: Heptanementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effects such as radiative extinction [9,25,26,36] and LTC phenomena as first postulated by Nayagam et al . in 2015 [37] and subsequently analyzed with detailed numerical modeling [38][39][40][41] may also be important in this regime. An intermediate regime where both radiation and diffusive transport are important would bridge regimes I and III.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the extinction boundary moves to the front of the droplet, it enters a region of gradually enriched oxygen concentration and higher temperature due to the flow and the flame recedes to the back side as combustion is re-established, thereby completing one cycle of an oscillation. This sort of oscillatory phenomenon has often been associated with "cool flame" phenomena (Nayagam et al 2012;Dietrich et al 2014). Fig.…”
Section: Creating Spherically Symmetric Droplet Burning Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For large droplets, radiation can be important to promote extinction with the possibility of "cool flames" (Nayagam et al 2012;Dietrich et al 2014) that are characterized by a low-temperature combustion regime of burning. By varying D o from about 0.5 mm up to about 6 mm, the complete range of physical phenomenon a liquid fuel could experience in a combustion environment can be accessed.…”
Section: Creating Spherically Symmetric Droplet Burning Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%