2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can CAD/CAM resin blocks be considered as substitute for conventional resins?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventional composite resins, such as Z350, reveal a wear resistance lower than that of the outer layer of mild dental fluorosis; such a characteristic may lead to increased wear of the restorative materials. Composite resin block, such as LUV, is fabricated under high temperatures and high pressures and possesses mechanical properties superior to those of the conventional composite resins [ 50 ]. In the present study, composite resin block showed a wear resistance similar to that of the outer layer of the mild dental fluorosis enamel.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional composite resins, such as Z350, reveal a wear resistance lower than that of the outer layer of mild dental fluorosis; such a characteristic may lead to increased wear of the restorative materials. Composite resin block, such as LUV, is fabricated under high temperatures and high pressures and possesses mechanical properties superior to those of the conventional composite resins [ 50 ]. In the present study, composite resin block showed a wear resistance similar to that of the outer layer of the mild dental fluorosis enamel.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A: adhesive failure at the interface between a resin cement and CAD/ CAM composite block, B: mixed failure including cohesive failure in cement and adhesive failure at the interface between resin cement and CAD/ CAM composite block, C: mixed failure including cohesive failure in CAD/CAM composite block and adhesive failure at the interface between resin cement and CAD/CAM composite block, and D: cohesive failure in CAD/CAM composite block. leading to higher degree of conversion with less residual monomer available compared with direct restoration resin composite materials 8) . This means there are much fewer free double bonds thus making it more difficult for a chemical link between resin cement and CAD/CAM block surface 22) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, resin composite materials may offer significant advantages related to their machinability and especially intra-oral reparability which is much simpler than ceramic repair 6,7) . The aforementioned factors make resin composite materials a promising option in CAD/ CAM dentistry 8) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemical and mechanical variations in these restorative materials give differing wear resistance, strength, elution of monomers, degree of curing, and indications for use 1 . It is therefore important that the properties of the materials used in restorative dentistry are thoroughly investigated, characterized, and understood 7 , 8 . Materials with less desirable functions increase the risk of secondary caries, mechanical failure, and fast material deterioration 9 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%