2018
DOI: 10.1080/14616742.2017.1413583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can abortion rights be integrated into the Women, Peace and Security agenda?

Abstract: Reproductive rights are an under-theorised aspect of the Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda, most clearly typified in United Nations Security Council resolution (UNSCR) 1325 and successive resolutions. Yet reproductive rights are central to women's security, health and human rights. Although they feature in the 2015 Global Study on 1325, there is less reference to reproductive rights, and to abortion specifically, in the suite of UNSC resolutions themselves, nor the National Actions Plans (NAPs -policy doc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The link between the focus and location is clear here-the UK has a large military and is, like Sweden, engaged in field operations outside of Europe (Duncanson 2013;Kronsell 2012). European FSS also discusses issues of health (Harman 2021) and reproductive health (Thomson and Pierson 2018).…”
Section: Issues and Silencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The link between the focus and location is clear here-the UK has a large military and is, like Sweden, engaged in field operations outside of Europe (Duncanson 2013;Kronsell 2012). European FSS also discusses issues of health (Harman 2021) and reproductive health (Thomson and Pierson 2018).…”
Section: Issues and Silencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, recent developments at the UN Security Council have seen attempts to restrict and water down the agenda. For example, in 2019 the passing of Resolution 2467 on sexual violence was possible only after difficult negotiations which saw the U.S. administration (as well as Russia and China) impose a veto on the inclusion of references to sexual health and reproductive rights, an aspect that it still insufficiently addressed in WPS (Thomson and Pierson 2018). Similarly, in October 2020, the 20 th anniversary of UNSCR 1325, Russia proposed a new resolution deemed as an attempt to reverse some of the WPS commitment.…”
Section: The Pillarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the Resolutions have helped the international community highlight sexual violence in conflict, they have been relatively silent on other issues and identities. For example, the Resolutions have said little about reproductive rights, with Resolution 2106 (passed in 2013) and Resolution 2122 (passed in 2013) being the only ones to contain an explicit reference to reproductive rights (Thomson & Pierson 2018). Importantly, they are framed in the language of ‘health’ rather than rights, with no greater specificity as to what this might actually refer to in terms of service provision.…”
Section: Women Peace and Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%