2017
DOI: 10.1089/brain.2017.0507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can a Resting-State Functional Connectivity Index Identify Patients with Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment Across Multiple Sites?

Abstract: Resting-state functional connectivity is one promising biomarker for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, it is still not known how accurately network analysis identifies AD and MCI across multiple sites. In this study, we examined whether resting-state functional connectivity data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) could identify patients with AD and MCI at our site. We implemented an index based on the functional connectivity frequency distribution, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the activity flow model assumes that the whole-brain activation state translates a connectivity profile into a task activation, consistent with the proposed mechanism of neural activity (and associated cognitive information) propagating across paths weighted by restFC. Another limitation to a reliance on data-driven optimization is the evidenced risk of overfitting to noise in the training set (Onoda et al, 2017;Teipel et al, 2017;Fountain-Zaragoza et al, 2019). Whilst the need to test the generalizability of connectivity-based predictive models across out-of-set samples and scanner sites also applies to activity flow, it is possible that an increased emphasis on neuroscientific theory (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, the activity flow model assumes that the whole-brain activation state translates a connectivity profile into a task activation, consistent with the proposed mechanism of neural activity (and associated cognitive information) propagating across paths weighted by restFC. Another limitation to a reliance on data-driven optimization is the evidenced risk of overfitting to noise in the training set (Onoda et al, 2017;Teipel et al, 2017;Fountain-Zaragoza et al, 2019). Whilst the need to test the generalizability of connectivity-based predictive models across out-of-set samples and scanner sites also applies to activity flow, it is possible that an increased emphasis on neuroscientific theory (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent reports have extended towards using restFC to quantitatively predict or classify age-related conditions (Dosenbach et al, 2010;Woo et al, 2017;Du et al, 2018). However, failures of predictive models generalizing out-of-sample (Onoda et al, 2017;Teipel et al, 2017;Fountain-Zaragoza et al, 2019) highlight limitations of entirely data-driven approaches to predicting Alzheimer's-related pathologies, especially as artifactual contaminants of restFC can drive clinical group differences (Siegel et al, 2016;Hodgson et al, 2017). These findings again call for increased efforts to clarify the cognitive relevance of restFC to identify clear mechanisms by which restFC alterations impact on AD and other pathologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With BFN features, machine learning can be of great help for detecting disease-related abnormal patterns and increasing accuracy for individualized MCI diagnosis. Vast majority of these studies have used simple but very effective classifiers, such as support vector machine (SVM) [12], [13]. However, these classifiers might face problem when dealing with the highly-complex spatiotemporal connectomics information and lead to unsatisfactory eMCI diagnostic accuracy, partially due to more subtle changes in the BFNs compared to the late MCI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These included two healthy participants, five MCI patients, and two AD dementia patients. This is a procedure that is widely used to minimise the impact of excessive motion [ 46 50 ]. One additional patient with dementia and one additional control were excluded because of signal artefacts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%